Does leaf anatomy aid in species identification of Butia (Arecaceae)?

Our paper presents reliable anatomical characters of the pinnae that allowed the identification of the recognized species of Butia through a purely anatomical key, in which specific identification is performed by a set of up to five characters. Leaf anatomy, already used to support new taxa in related genera, can also be useful to validate questionable Butia species and differentiate between similar species, but surprisingly does not reflect the proposed phylogenetic relationship between species of this genus. Abstract Butia is a neotropical genus whose identification is based mostly on characters from external morphology, which are sometimes variable or inadequate for species differentiation. We aimed to verify if leaf anatomy of 18 Butia species brings new characters suitable for species identification and if it corroborates the phylogenetic relationship within the genus. Moreover, we propose an anatomical key to assist in species identification. Pinnae were collected and subjected to the usual techniques for light and scanning electron microscopies. The anatomical key was created with the aid of Xper2 software, based on the importance of characters to distinguish species according to the Jaccard index. All species have isobilateral mirrored mesophyll, amphistomatic leaves and secondary vascular bundles with sclerenchymatic sheath reinforcement connected to the hypodermis. Among the species studied, B. marmorii and B. matogrossensis showed exclusive characters. For the other species, up to five characters are sufficient for delimitation. Our anatomical key presents relevant characters that allow the identification of the recognized species of Butia. Reliable anatomical characters of easy observation, especially the raphides, are valuable in species distinction. Leaf anatomy, already used to support new taxa in related genera like Allagoptera and Syagrus, can also be useful to validate questionable Butia species and differentiate between similar species but do not reflect the proposed relationship between Butia species.