Empagliflozin as add‐on to linagliptin in a fixed‐dose combination in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Glycaemic efficacy and safety profile in a 52‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

Aims This double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02453555) evaluated the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (Empa) 10 or 25 mg as add‐on to linagliptin (Lina) 5 mg (fixed‐dose combination, Empa/Lina 10/5 or 25/5) in insufficiently controlled Japanese type 2 diabe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2018-09, Vol.20 (9), p.2200-2209
Hauptverfasser: Kawamori, Ryuzo, Haneda, Masakazu, Suzaki, Keiko, Cheng, Gang, Shiki, Kosuke, Miyamoto, Yuki, Solimando, Fernando, Lee, Christopher, Lee, Jisoo, George, Jyothis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims This double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02453555) evaluated the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin (Empa) 10 or 25 mg as add‐on to linagliptin (Lina) 5 mg (fixed‐dose combination, Empa/Lina 10/5 or 25/5) in insufficiently controlled Japanese type 2 diabetes patients. Methods The trial (40 sites; May 2015‐March 2017) involved screening 433 adults (≥20 years) who were treatment‐naive or were using one oral antidiabetic drug for ≥12 weeks, which was discontinued at enrolment. Patients with HbA1c 7.5%‐10.0% after ≥16 weeks of using Lina (pre‐enrolment or during a 16‐week, open‐label period) and 2 weeks of using placebo (Plc) for Empa/Lina 10/5, plus Lina, were randomized (2:1) to once‐daily Empa/Lina 10/5 (n = 182) or Plc/Lina 10/5 (n = 93) for 24 weeks. Patients with HbA1c ≥ 7.0% at Week 24 received Empa/Lina up‐titrated to 25/5 (n = 126) or the corresponding placebo (n = 80), per randomization, from Week 28; 172 Empa/Lina and 84 Plc/Lina patients completed 52 weeks. Results Change from baseline in HbA1c was greater (P < .0001) with Empa/Lina than with Plc/Lina at Week 24 (primary outcome, −0.93% vs 0.21%; adjusted mean difference, −1.14%) and Week 52 (−1.16% vs 0.06%; adjusted mean difference, −1.22%). More patients with HbA1c < 7.0% and greater decreases in fasting plasma glucose, body weight and systolic blood pressure were seen in the Empa/Lina group than in the Plc/Lina group. Empa/Lina was well tolerated. The adverse events that were more frequent with Empa/Lina were known empagliflozin‐associated events (eg, increased urination, increased blood ketones). There were no adjudication‐confirmed diabetic ketoacidosis events or lower limb amputations. Conclusions These results support the notion that empagliflozin‐linagliptin in fixed‐dose combination is a therapeutic option for Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.13352