Effect of Low Back Pain Risk-Stratification Strategy on Patient Outcomes and Care Processes: the MATCH Randomized Trial in Primary Care

Background The STarT Back strategy for categorizing and treating patients with low back pain (LBP) improved patients’ function while reducing costs in England. Objective This trial evaluated the effect of implementing an adaptation of this approach in a US setting. Design The Matching Appropriate Tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM 2018-08, Vol.33 (8), p.1324-1336
Hauptverfasser: Cherkin, Dan, Balderson, Benjamin, Wellman, Rob, Hsu, Clarissa, Sherman, Karen J., Evers, Sarah C., Hawkes, Rene, Cook, Andrea, Levine, Martin D., Piekara, Diane, Rock, Pam, Estlin, Katherine Talbert, Brewer, Georgie, Jensen, Mark, LaPorte, Anne-Marie, Yeoman, John, Sowden, Gail, Hill, Jonathan C., Foster, Nadine E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The STarT Back strategy for categorizing and treating patients with low back pain (LBP) improved patients’ function while reducing costs in England. Objective This trial evaluated the effect of implementing an adaptation of this approach in a US setting. Design The Matching Appropriate Treatments to Consumer Healthcare needs (MATCH) trial was a pragmatic cluster randomized trial with a pre-intervention baseline period. Six primary care clinics were pair randomized, three to training in the STarT Back strategy and three to serve as controls. Participants Adults receiving primary care for non-specific LBP were invited to provide data 2 weeks after their primary care visit and follow-up data 2 and 6 months (primary endpoint) later. Interventions The STarT Back risk-stratification strategy matches treatments for LBP to physical and psychosocial obstacles to recovery using patient-reported data (the STarT Back Tool) to categorize patients’ risk of persistent disabling pain. Primary care clinicians in the intervention clinics attended six didactic sessions to improve their understanding LBP management and received in-person training in the use of the tool that had been incorporated into the electronic health record (EHR). Physical therapists received 5 days of intensive training. Control clinics received no training. Main measures Primary outcomes were back-related physical function and pain severity. Intervention effects were estimated by comparing mean changes in patient outcomes after 2 and 6 months between intervention and control clinics. Differences in change scores by trial arm and time period were estimated using linear mixed effect models. Secondary outcomes included healthcare utilization. Key Results Although clinicians used the tool for about half of their patients, they did not change the treatments they recommended. The intervention had no significant effect on patient outcomes or healthcare use. Conclusions A resource-intensive intervention to support stratified care for LBP in a US healthcare setting had no effect on patient outcomes or healthcare use. Trial Registration National Clinical Trial Number NCT02286141.
ISSN:0884-8734
1525-1497
DOI:10.1007/s11606-018-4468-9