What is The Impact of PAO Surgery on Patient Function and Activity Levels?

Objectives: The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is becoming a widely utilized procedure. Patients are younger, highly active, and may desire to return to sport activity. Counseling and managing expectations in these patients is challenging as there is limited information regarding activity le...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2018-07, Vol.6 (7_suppl4)
Hauptverfasser: Petrie, Jeff, An, Tonya, Schoenecker, Perry, Zaltz, Ira, Kim, Young-Jo, Millis, Michael B., Beaule, Paul, Sierra, Rafael J., Trousdale, Robert, Sucato, Daniel J., Podeszwa, David, Sink, Ernest, Clohisy, John C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is becoming a widely utilized procedure. Patients are younger, highly active, and may desire to return to sport activity. Counseling and managing expectations in these patients is challenging as there is limited information regarding activity level after PAO. The purpose of this study was to analyze physical activity levels after PAO in a large, prospective multicenter cohort. Methods: Assessment of prospectively collected data from a multicenter group included 456 hips treated by PAO for hip dysplasia. After exclusions, 359 hips (80 male, 279 female) remained with a mean age of 25.9 years and mean BMI of 25. Demographics, radiographic measures, and clinical outcomes were evaluated preoperatively, at 1 year follow-up, and at minimum 2 years postoperatively (mean 44.9 months). Activity level was assessed with the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, patients were stratified into low, moderate, and high activity groups based on preoperative function. Descriptive statistics and linear regressions were performed for the primary outcome of change in UCLA. Results: UCLA scores were improved on average 0.6 points at final follow up (p = 0.001). When stratified, the low activity and moderate activity groups had significant improvement in UCLA scores (p
ISSN:2325-9671
2325-9671
DOI:10.1177/2325967118S00150