REPLY TO BARNETT ET AL: Regarding interpretation of Granger causality analyses
Stokes and Purdon present their reply to Barnett et al who comments on their study about the interpretation of Granger causality analyses in neuroscience. It mentioned their work to characterize statistical properties of the traditional computation of Granger-Geweke (GG) causality and to analyze how...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS 2018-07, Vol.115 (29), p.E6678-E6679 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Stokes and Purdon present their reply to Barnett et al who comments on their study about the interpretation of Granger causality analyses in neuroscience. It mentioned their work to characterize statistical properties of the traditional computation of Granger-Geweke (GG) causality and to analyze how the dynamics of the system are represented in the GG-causality measure. And the point out of Barnet et al that the issues with bias and variance in the conditional GG causality can be addressed using a state-space approach and a single-model fit. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1807099115 |