Development and efficacy of a clinician‐targeted refresher course for treating nonpneumonia respiratory tract infections

Background In 2017, the Japanese government published an evidence‐based manual describing the appropriate use of antibiotics in outpatient settings to tackle the problem of antimicrobial resistance. To fill the evidence‐practice gap, we developed a clinician‐targeted course aimed at improving clinic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of general and family medicine 2018-07, Vol.19 (4), p.127-132
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto, Shungo, Gu, Yoshiaki, Fujitomo, Yumiko, Kanai, Nobuyuki, Yamahata, Yoshihiro, Saito, Hiroyuki, Hashimoto, Tadayuki, Ohmagari, Norio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background In 2017, the Japanese government published an evidence‐based manual describing the appropriate use of antibiotics in outpatient settings to tackle the problem of antimicrobial resistance. To fill the evidence‐practice gap, we developed a clinician‐targeted course aimed at improving clinician skills in the daily clinical practice of treating acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) based on the manual. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the course. Methods This course consisted of lectures using illness scripts and checklists, as well as interactive communication skills training using role‐playing. We performed a vignette‐based evaluation of the changes in the knowledge and attitudes of the course participants toward prescribing antibiotics for nonpneumonia RTIs, using pre‐ and postcourse questionnaires. The questionnaires also included course feedback via the use of a 5‐point Likert scale. Results Thirty‐eight clinicians were included in the analyses, and 90% of these participants had graduated ≥20 years ago. We found statistically significant reductions in the intention to prescribe antibiotics for four of the six nonpneumonia RTI vignettes: acute bronchitis (−47.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] −66.3 to −28.1%), common cold (−16.2%; 95% CI −30.8 to −1.6%), acute pharyngitis (−27.0%; 95% CI −49.0 to −5.0%), and acute rhinosinusitis (−33.3%; 95% CI −53.3 to −13.3%). The course seemed to be satisfactory for experienced doctors who were the relevant target population of such a workshop. Conclusions The refresher course was helpful for reducing the participants’ intensions to prescribe antibiotics for nonpneumonia RTIs. We developed a clinician‐targeted refresher course for the practice of treating nonpneumonia RTIs, which consisted of lectures using illness scripts and checklists, and interactive communication skills training using a role‐playing. After the course, we found significant reductions in the proportions of the participants’ attitudes toward prescribing antibiotics for nonpneumonia RTIs.
ISSN:2189-7948
2189-6577
2189-7948
DOI:10.1002/jgf2.183