Errors in cervical spine immobilization during pediatric trauma evaluation

The purpose of this study was to identify factors during trauma evaluation that increase the likelihood of errors in cervical spine immobilization (‘lapses’). Multivariate analysis was used to identify the associations between patient characteristics, event features, and tasks performed in proximity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2018-08, Vol.228, p.135-141
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed, Omar Z., Webman, Rachel B., Sheth, Puja D., Donnenfield, Jonah I., Yang, JaeWon, Sarcevic, Aleksandra, Marsic, Ivan, Burd, Randall S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to identify factors during trauma evaluation that increase the likelihood of errors in cervical spine immobilization (‘lapses’). Multivariate analysis was used to identify the associations between patient characteristics, event features, and tasks performed in proximity to the head and neck and the occurrence and duration of a lapse in maintaining cervical spine immobilization during 56 pediatric trauma evaluations. Lapses in cervical spine immobilization occurred in 71.4% of patients (n = 40), with an average of 1.2 ± 1.3 lapses per patient. Head and neck tasks classified as oxygen manipulation occurred an average of 12.2 ± 9.7 times per patient, whereas those related to neck examination and cervical collar manipulation occurred an average of 2.7 ± 1.7 and 2.1 ± 1.2 times per patient, respectively. More oxygen-related tasks were performed among patients who had than those who did not have a lapse (27.3 ± 16.5 versus 11.5 ± 8.0 tasks, P = 0.001). Patients who had cervical collar placement or manipulation had a two-fold higher risk of a lapse than those who did not have these tasks performed (OR 1.92, 95% CI 0.56, 3.28, P = 0.006). More lapses occurred during evaluations on the weekend (P = 0.01), when more tasks related to supplemental oxygen manipulation were performed (P = 0.02) and when more tasks associated with cervical collar management were performed (P 
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.023