Surgical Treatment of Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Major Complication Rates, Progression Free and Overall Survival
Abstract Objective We aimed to compare major complication rates in patients undergoing open versus endoscopic resection of olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and to determine the prognostic utility of the Kadish staging and Hyams grading systems with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base Skull base, 2018-04, Vol.79 (2), p.151-155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Objective
We aimed to compare major complication rates in patients undergoing open versus endoscopic resection of olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) and to determine the prognostic utility of the Kadish staging and Hyams grading systems with respect to progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
Methods
It is a retrospective review of experience in treating ONB at a single tertiary care hospital from 1987 through 2015. Major complications were defined as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, meningitis, osteomyelitis, tracheostomy, and severe neurologic injury.
Results
Forty-one patients were included. An open approach was used in 34 (83%), endoscopic in 6 (15%), and combined in 1 (2%) case. Rates of major complications by surgical approach were 17% after endoscopic versus 31% after open (
p
= 0.65). There was no significant difference in PFS or OS based on Kadish B versus C (PFS,
p
= 0.28; OS,
p
= 0.11) or Hyams grade 1 and 2 versus Hyams grade 3 and 4 (PFS,
p
= 0.53; OS,
p
= 0.38).
Conclusions
There was no significant difference in major complications between open and endoscopic approaches for the treatment of ONB. Patient stratification using the Kadish staging and Hyams grading systems did not show significant differences in PFS or OS. Further research is needed to determine if a different staging system would better predict patient outcomes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2193-6331 2193-634X |
DOI: | 10.1055/s-0037-1605593 |