Pasireotide does not improve efficacy of aspiration sclerotherapy in patients with large hepatic cysts, a randomized controlled trial

Objectives We tested whether complementary use of the somatostatin analogue pasireotide would augment efficacy of aspiration sclerotherapy of hepatic cysts. Methods We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients who underwent aspiration sclerotherapy of a large (>5 cm) symptoma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology 2018-06, Vol.28 (6), p.2682-2689
Hauptverfasser: Wijnands, Titus F. M., Gevers, Tom J. G., Lantinga, Marten A., te Morsche, René H., Schultze Kool, Leo J., Drenth, Joost P. H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives We tested whether complementary use of the somatostatin analogue pasireotide would augment efficacy of aspiration sclerotherapy of hepatic cysts. Methods We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients who underwent aspiration sclerotherapy of a large (>5 cm) symptomatic hepatic cyst. Patients were randomized to either intramuscular injections of pasireotide 60 mg long-acting release (n = 17) or placebo (sodium chloride 0.9 %, n = 17). Injections were administered 2 weeks before and 2 weeks after aspiration sclerotherapy. The primary endpoint was proportional cyst diameter reduction (%) from baseline to 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included long-term cyst reduction at 26 weeks, patient-reported outcomes including the polycystic liver disease-questionnaire (PLD-Q) and safety. Results Thirty-four patients (32 females; 53.6 ± 7.8 years) were randomized between pasireotide or placebo. Pasireotide did not improve efficacy of aspiration sclerotherapy at 6 weeks compared to controls (23.6 % [IQR 12.6–30.0] vs. 21.8 % [9.6–31.8]; p  = 0.96). Long-term cyst diameter reduction was similar in both groups (49.1 % [27.0–73.6] and 45.6 % [29.6–59.6]; p  = 0.90). Mean PLD-Q scores improved significantly in both groups ( p  
ISSN:0938-7994
1432-1084
DOI:10.1007/s00330-017-5205-1