The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild
Although there are many examples of contemporary directional selection, evidence for responses to selection that match predictions are often missing in quantitative genetic studies of wild populations. This is despite the presence of genetic variation and selection pressures – theoretical prerequisi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2018-05, Vol.33 (5), p.337-346 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 346 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 337 |
container_title | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Pujol, Benoit Blanchet, Simon Charmantier, Anne Danchin, Etienne Facon, Benoit Marrot, Pascal Roux, Fabrice Scotti, Ivan Teplitsky, Céline Thomson, Caroline E. Winney, Isabel |
description | Although there are many examples of contemporary directional selection, evidence for responses to selection that match predictions are often missing in quantitative genetic studies of wild populations. This is despite the presence of genetic variation and selection pressures – theoretical prerequisites for the response to selection. This conundrum can be explained by statistical issues with accurate parameter estimation, and by biological mechanisms that interfere with the response to selection. These biological mechanisms can accelerate or constrain this response. These mechanisms are generally studied independently but might act simultaneously. We therefore integrated these mechanisms to explore their potential combined effect. This has implications for explaining the apparent evolutionary stasis of wild populations and the conservation of wildlife.
Recent discoveries at the intersection of quantitative genetics and evolutionary ecology are challenging our views on the potential of wild populations to respond to selection.
Multiple biological mechanisms can disconnect genetic variation from the response to selection in the wild. We highlight areas for future research.
We provide an integrative framework that can be used to qualitatively assess the combined influence of these mechanisms on the response to selection. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5937857</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169534718300399</els_id><sourcerecordid>2023407003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3faa971ea5de848c6cf9618c575877ba3dd266fc8a4c37295aeaac9b7412c8e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtLwzAYhoMoOqd_wAvppV605tA2CYgwhjphInjAy5ClX11G18ykG_jvzZgO9cLcBJLne1-SB6ETgjOCSXkxyzoPkFFMRIZphjHfQT0iOE0FE2wX9SIk04Ll_AAdhjDDcclc7qMDKksqaFn2UPo8heTehmDbt-QRwsK1AZLOJU_QgOmsaxPbJl2EXm1THaG9WjcBjr_2Pnq5uX4ejtLxw-3dcDBOTS5kl7Jaa8kJ6KICkQtTmlqWRJiCF4LziWZVFctrI3RuGKey0KC1kROeE2oE5KyPrja5i-VkDpWBtvO6UQtv59p_KKet-n3T2ql6cytVSMZFwWPA-SZg-mdsNBir9RmmpCS84CsS2bOvMu_elxA6NbfBQNPoFtwyKIopyzHHmEWUblDjXQge6m02wWrtRM3U2olaO4kdKjqJQ6c_H7Md-ZYQgcsNAPFLVxa8CsZCa6CyPjpQlbP_5X8CUtWcsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2023407003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Pujol, Benoit ; Blanchet, Simon ; Charmantier, Anne ; Danchin, Etienne ; Facon, Benoit ; Marrot, Pascal ; Roux, Fabrice ; Scotti, Ivan ; Teplitsky, Céline ; Thomson, Caroline E. ; Winney, Isabel</creator><creatorcontrib>Pujol, Benoit ; Blanchet, Simon ; Charmantier, Anne ; Danchin, Etienne ; Facon, Benoit ; Marrot, Pascal ; Roux, Fabrice ; Scotti, Ivan ; Teplitsky, Céline ; Thomson, Caroline E. ; Winney, Isabel</creatorcontrib><description>Although there are many examples of contemporary directional selection, evidence for responses to selection that match predictions are often missing in quantitative genetic studies of wild populations. This is despite the presence of genetic variation and selection pressures – theoretical prerequisites for the response to selection. This conundrum can be explained by statistical issues with accurate parameter estimation, and by biological mechanisms that interfere with the response to selection. These biological mechanisms can accelerate or constrain this response. These mechanisms are generally studied independently but might act simultaneously. We therefore integrated these mechanisms to explore their potential combined effect. This has implications for explaining the apparent evolutionary stasis of wild populations and the conservation of wildlife.
Recent discoveries at the intersection of quantitative genetics and evolutionary ecology are challenging our views on the potential of wild populations to respond to selection.
Multiple biological mechanisms can disconnect genetic variation from the response to selection in the wild. We highlight areas for future research.
We provide an integrative framework that can be used to qualitatively assess the combined influence of these mechanisms on the response to selection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-5347</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29628266</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Animals, Wild - genetics ; Biodiversity ; Biological Evolution ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; evolutionary potential ; fitness-related traits ; Genetic Variation ; Genetics ; heritability ; Life Sciences ; microevolutionary stasis ; Populations and Evolution ; Selection, Genetic</subject><ispartof>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2018-05, Vol.33 (5), p.337-346</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><rights>2018 The Authors 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3faa971ea5de848c6cf9618c575877ba3dd266fc8a4c37295aeaac9b7412c8e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3faa971ea5de848c6cf9618c575877ba3dd266fc8a4c37295aeaac9b7412c8e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9703-6760 ; 0000-0002-3843-589X ; 0000-0001-8059-5638 ; 0000-0001-8970-6840 ; 0000-0001-9458-709X ; 0000-0002-0691-2647 ; 0000-0003-1477-2370 ; 0000-0002-8951-2680</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.007$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29628266$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02161757$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pujol, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchet, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charmantier, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danchin, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facon, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrot, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scotti, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teplitsky, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Caroline E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winney, Isabel</creatorcontrib><title>The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild</title><title>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><description>Although there are many examples of contemporary directional selection, evidence for responses to selection that match predictions are often missing in quantitative genetic studies of wild populations. This is despite the presence of genetic variation and selection pressures – theoretical prerequisites for the response to selection. This conundrum can be explained by statistical issues with accurate parameter estimation, and by biological mechanisms that interfere with the response to selection. These biological mechanisms can accelerate or constrain this response. These mechanisms are generally studied independently but might act simultaneously. We therefore integrated these mechanisms to explore their potential combined effect. This has implications for explaining the apparent evolutionary stasis of wild populations and the conservation of wildlife.
Recent discoveries at the intersection of quantitative genetics and evolutionary ecology are challenging our views on the potential of wild populations to respond to selection.
Multiple biological mechanisms can disconnect genetic variation from the response to selection in the wild. We highlight areas for future research.
We provide an integrative framework that can be used to qualitatively assess the combined influence of these mechanisms on the response to selection.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild - genetics</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>evolutionary potential</subject><subject>fitness-related traits</subject><subject>Genetic Variation</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>heritability</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>microevolutionary stasis</subject><subject>Populations and Evolution</subject><subject>Selection, Genetic</subject><issn>0169-5347</issn><issn>1872-8383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtLwzAYhoMoOqd_wAvppV605tA2CYgwhjphInjAy5ClX11G18ykG_jvzZgO9cLcBJLne1-SB6ETgjOCSXkxyzoPkFFMRIZphjHfQT0iOE0FE2wX9SIk04Ll_AAdhjDDcclc7qMDKksqaFn2UPo8heTehmDbt-QRwsK1AZLOJU_QgOmsaxPbJl2EXm1THaG9WjcBjr_2Pnq5uX4ejtLxw-3dcDBOTS5kl7Jaa8kJ6KICkQtTmlqWRJiCF4LziWZVFctrI3RuGKey0KC1kROeE2oE5KyPrja5i-VkDpWBtvO6UQtv59p_KKet-n3T2ql6cytVSMZFwWPA-SZg-mdsNBir9RmmpCS84CsS2bOvMu_elxA6NbfBQNPoFtwyKIopyzHHmEWUblDjXQge6m02wWrtRM3U2olaO4kdKjqJQ6c_H7Md-ZYQgcsNAPFLVxa8CsZCa6CyPjpQlbP_5X8CUtWcsA</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Pujol, Benoit</creator><creator>Blanchet, Simon</creator><creator>Charmantier, Anne</creator><creator>Danchin, Etienne</creator><creator>Facon, Benoit</creator><creator>Marrot, Pascal</creator><creator>Roux, Fabrice</creator><creator>Scotti, Ivan</creator><creator>Teplitsky, Céline</creator><creator>Thomson, Caroline E.</creator><creator>Winney, Isabel</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Publishers</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-6760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-589X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-5638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-6840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-709X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-2647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1477-2370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-2680</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild</title><author>Pujol, Benoit ; Blanchet, Simon ; Charmantier, Anne ; Danchin, Etienne ; Facon, Benoit ; Marrot, Pascal ; Roux, Fabrice ; Scotti, Ivan ; Teplitsky, Céline ; Thomson, Caroline E. ; Winney, Isabel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c489t-3faa971ea5de848c6cf9618c575877ba3dd266fc8a4c37295aeaac9b7412c8e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild - genetics</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>evolutionary potential</topic><topic>fitness-related traits</topic><topic>Genetic Variation</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>heritability</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>microevolutionary stasis</topic><topic>Populations and Evolution</topic><topic>Selection, Genetic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pujol, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchet, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charmantier, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Danchin, Etienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facon, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marrot, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roux, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scotti, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teplitsky, Céline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Caroline E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winney, Isabel</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pujol, Benoit</au><au>Blanchet, Simon</au><au>Charmantier, Anne</au><au>Danchin, Etienne</au><au>Facon, Benoit</au><au>Marrot, Pascal</au><au>Roux, Fabrice</au><au>Scotti, Ivan</au><au>Teplitsky, Céline</au><au>Thomson, Caroline E.</au><au>Winney, Isabel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild</atitle><jtitle>Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Ecol Evol</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>346</epage><pages>337-346</pages><issn>0169-5347</issn><eissn>1872-8383</eissn><abstract>Although there are many examples of contemporary directional selection, evidence for responses to selection that match predictions are often missing in quantitative genetic studies of wild populations. This is despite the presence of genetic variation and selection pressures – theoretical prerequisites for the response to selection. This conundrum can be explained by statistical issues with accurate parameter estimation, and by biological mechanisms that interfere with the response to selection. These biological mechanisms can accelerate or constrain this response. These mechanisms are generally studied independently but might act simultaneously. We therefore integrated these mechanisms to explore their potential combined effect. This has implications for explaining the apparent evolutionary stasis of wild populations and the conservation of wildlife.
Recent discoveries at the intersection of quantitative genetics and evolutionary ecology are challenging our views on the potential of wild populations to respond to selection.
Multiple biological mechanisms can disconnect genetic variation from the response to selection in the wild. We highlight areas for future research.
We provide an integrative framework that can be used to qualitatively assess the combined influence of these mechanisms on the response to selection.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29628266</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-6760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3843-589X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-5638</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-6840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9458-709X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0691-2647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1477-2370</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-2680</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0169-5347 |
ispartof | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam), 2018-05, Vol.33 (5), p.337-346 |
issn | 0169-5347 1872-8383 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5937857 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Animals Animals, Wild - genetics Biodiversity Biological Evolution Conservation of Natural Resources evolutionary potential fitness-related traits Genetic Variation Genetics heritability Life Sciences microevolutionary stasis Populations and Evolution Selection, Genetic |
title | The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A45%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Missing%20Response%20to%20Selection%20in%20the%20Wild&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20ecology%20&%20evolution%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Pujol,%20Benoit&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=346&rft.pages=337-346&rft.issn=0169-5347&rft.eissn=1872-8383&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2023407003%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2023407003&rft_id=info:pmid/29628266&rft_els_id=S0169534718300399&rfr_iscdi=true |