The Missing Response to Selection in the Wild
Although there are many examples of contemporary directional selection, evidence for responses to selection that match predictions are often missing in quantitative genetic studies of wild populations. This is despite the presence of genetic variation and selection pressures – theoretical prerequisi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trends in ecology & evolution (Amsterdam) 2018-05, Vol.33 (5), p.337-346 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Although there are many examples of contemporary directional selection, evidence for responses to selection that match predictions are often missing in quantitative genetic studies of wild populations. This is despite the presence of genetic variation and selection pressures – theoretical prerequisites for the response to selection. This conundrum can be explained by statistical issues with accurate parameter estimation, and by biological mechanisms that interfere with the response to selection. These biological mechanisms can accelerate or constrain this response. These mechanisms are generally studied independently but might act simultaneously. We therefore integrated these mechanisms to explore their potential combined effect. This has implications for explaining the apparent evolutionary stasis of wild populations and the conservation of wildlife.
Recent discoveries at the intersection of quantitative genetics and evolutionary ecology are challenging our views on the potential of wild populations to respond to selection.
Multiple biological mechanisms can disconnect genetic variation from the response to selection in the wild. We highlight areas for future research.
We provide an integrative framework that can be used to qualitatively assess the combined influence of these mechanisms on the response to selection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0169-5347 1872-8383 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.007 |