Evaluation of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine using a novel phantomless dual-energy CT post-processing algorithm in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Background Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European radiology experimental 2017-09, Vol.1 (1), p.11-11, Article 11
Hauptverfasser: Booz, Christian, Hofmann, Philipp C., Sedlmair, Martin, Flohr, Thomas G., Schmidt, Bernhard, D’Angelo, Tommaso, Martin, Simon S., Lenga, Lukas, Leithner, Doris, Vogl, Thomas J., Wichmann, Julian L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Current techniques for evaluation of bone mineral density (BMD) commonly require phantom calibration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel algorithm for phantomless in vivo dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based assessment of BMD of the lumbar spine in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Methods Data from clinically indicated DECT and DEXA examinations within two months comprising the lumbar spine of 47 patients were retrospectively evaluated. By using a novel automated dedicated post-processing algorithm for DECT, the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae L1–L4 was selected and analysed. Linear correlation was analysed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient for the comparison of the results from DECT and DEXA. Results A total of 186 lumbar vertebrae in 47 patients (mean age, 58 years; age range, 24–85 years) were analysed, 24 men (mean age, 55 years; age range, 24–85 years) and 23 women (mean age, 59 years; age range, 31–80 years). Mean BMD of L1–L4 determined with DEXA was 0.985 g/cm 2 and 20/47 patients (42.6%) showed an osteoporotic BMD (T score lower than – 2.5) of at least two vertebrae. Average DECT-based BMD of L1–L4 was 86.8 mg/cm 3 . Regression analysis demonstrated a lack of correlation between DECT- and DEXA-based BMD values with a Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient r = 0.4205. Conclusions Dedicated post-processing of DECT data using a novel algorithm for retrospective phantomless BMD assessment of the trabecular bone of lumbar vertebrae from clinically indicated DECT examinations is feasible.
ISSN:2509-9280
2509-9280
DOI:10.1186/s41747-017-0017-2