Is shock impedance value alone to be considered a good predictor for shock efficacy in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator?

Key Clinical Message Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) is easy to implant, with poor risks of the patient. However, fat is a poor current conductor and increases defibrillation threshold. As shock impedance alone should not be considered a good efficacy predictor of an S‐IC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical case reports 2018-04, Vol.6 (4), p.574-577
Hauptverfasser: Di Girolamo, Enrico, Furia, Nanda, Faustino, Massimiliano, Appignani, Marianna, Arcari, Giampiero, Angelini, Alessandro, Spadoni, Loris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Key Clinical Message Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) is easy to implant, with poor risks of the patient. However, fat is a poor current conductor and increases defibrillation threshold. As shock impedance alone should not be considered a good efficacy predictor of an S‐ICD system, an X‐ray latero‐lateral view for lead position should be achieved. Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S‐ICD) is easy to implant, with poor risks of the patient. However, fat is a poor current conductor and increases defibrillation threshold. As shock impedance alone should not be considered a good efficacy predictor of an S‐ICD system, an X‐ray latero‐lateral view for lead position should be achieved.
ISSN:2050-0904
2050-0904
DOI:10.1002/ccr3.1408