An evaluation of the challenges to developing tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing methodologies for clinical practice

Ovarian cancer patients with germline or somatic pathogenic variants benefit from treatment with poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Tumor BRCA1/2 testing is more challenging than germline testing as the majority of samples are formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE), the tumor genome is c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human mutation 2018-03, Vol.39 (3), p.394-405
Hauptverfasser: Ellison, Gillian, Ahdesmäki, Miika, Luke, Sally, Waring, Paul M., Wallace, Andrew, Wright, Ronnie, Röthlisberger, Benno, Ludin, Katja, Merkelbach‐Bruse, Sabine, Heydt, Carina, Ligtenberg, Marjolijn J.L., Mensenkamp, Arjen R., Castro, David Gonzalez, Jones, Thomas, Vivancos, Ana, Kondrashova, Olga, Pauwels, Patrick, Weyn, Christine, Hahnen, Eric, Hauke, Jan, Soong, Richie, Lai, Zhongwu, Dougherty, Brian, Carr, T. Hedley, Johnson, Justin, Mills, John, Barrett, J. Carl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ovarian cancer patients with germline or somatic pathogenic variants benefit from treatment with poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Tumor BRCA1/2 testing is more challenging than germline testing as the majority of samples are formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE), the tumor genome is complex, and the allelic fraction of somatic variants can be low. We collaborated with 10 laboratories testing BRCA1/2 in tumors to compare different approaches to identify clinically important variants within FFPE tumor DNA samples. This was not a proficiency study but an inter‐laboratory comparison to identify common issues. Each laboratory received the same tumor DNA samples ranging in genotype, quantity, quality, and variant allele frequency (VAF). Each laboratory performed their preferred next‐generation sequencing method to report on the variants. No false positive results were reported in this small study and the majority of methods detected the low VAF variants. A number of variants were not detected due to the bioinformatics analysis, variant classification, or insufficient DNA. The use of hybridization capture or short amplicon methods are recommended based on a bioinformatic assessment of the data. The study highlights the importance of establishing standards and standardization for tBRCA testing particularly when the test results dictate clinical decisions regarding life extending therapies. Ovarian cancer patients with germline or somatic pathogenic variants in the BRCA genes benefit from treatment with PARP inhibitors. Tumour BRCA1/2 testing is challenging as the majority of samples are FFPE, the tumour genome is complex and the allelic fraction of somatic variant can be low. This study reports intriguing results from ten independent tBRCA testing laboratories and highlights the importance of establishing standards and standardization particularly when the test results dictate clinical decisions regarding life extending therapies.
ISSN:1059-7794
1098-1004
DOI:10.1002/humu.23375