Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Positivity and Predictors Among Previously Undiagnosed Adult Primary Care Outpatients: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Multisite Retrospective Cohort Study

Background. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1998 recommends HCV antibody (anti-HCV) testing for persons with specified risk factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of anti-HCV positivity am...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2015-04, Vol.60 (8), p.1145-1152
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Bryce D., Yartel, Anthony K., Krauskopf, Katherine, Massoud, Omar I., Brown, Kimberly A., Fallon, Michael B., Rein, David B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1998 recommends HCV antibody (anti-HCV) testing for persons with specified risk factors. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of anti-HCV positivity among primary care outpatients and estimate the proportion of unidentified anti-HCV-positive (anti-HCV+) persons using risk-based testing. Methods. We analyzed electronic medical record data from a 4-site retrospective study. Patients were aged≥18 years, utilized ≥1 outpatient primary care service(s) between 2005 and 2010, and had no documented evidence of prior HCV diagnosis. Among persons tested for anti-HCV, we fit a multilevel logistic regression model to identify patient-level independent predictors of anti-HCV positivity. We estimated the proportion of unidentified anti-HCV+ persons by using multiple imputation to assign anti-HCV results to untested patients. Results. We observed 209 076 patients for a median of 5 months (interquartile range, 1–23 months). Among 17 464 (8.4%) patients who were tested for anti-HCV, 6.4% (n = 1115) were positive. We identified history of injection drug use (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 6.3 [5.2–7.6]), 1945–1965 birth cohort (4.4 [3.8–5.1]), and elevated alanine aminotransferase levels (4.8 [4.2–5.6]) as independently associated with anti-HCV positivity. We estimated that 81.5% (n = 4890/6005) of anti-HCV+ patients were unidentified using risk-based testing. Conclusions. In these outpatient primary care settings, risk-based testing may have missed 4 of 5 newly enrolled patients who are anti-HCV+. Without knowing their status, unidentified anti-HCV+ persons cannot receive further clinical evaluation or antiviral treatment, and are unlikely to benefit from secondary prevention recommendations to limit disease progression and mortality.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/civ002