Corneal densitometry after photorefractive keratectomy, laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, and small-incision lenticule extraction

Purpose The aim of this study was to gain greater insight into the corneal densitometry changes occurring as a result of refractive surgery and to compare these changes across three widely used surgical techniques, namely, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eye (London) 2017-12, Vol.31 (12), p.1647-1654
Hauptverfasser: Poyales, F, Garzón, N, Mendicute, J, Illarramendi, I, Caro, P, Jáñez, O, Argüeso, F, López, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The aim of this study was to gain greater insight into the corneal densitometry changes occurring as a result of refractive surgery and to compare these changes across three widely used surgical techniques, namely, photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with a femtosecond laser (LASIK-FS), or ReLEx small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Patients and methods Three hundred and thirty-six patients (184 male and 152 female patients) participated in this study. They were split into three groups according to the refractive surgery technique they had undergone: LASIK-FS (74 patients), PRK (153 patients), and ReLEx SMILE (109 patients). All participants underwent an exhaustive eye examination both before and after surgery. Pre- and postoperative corneal densitometry was measured using an Oculus Pentacam system. Results The mean postoperative total corneal densitometry values were 16.53±1.94 for the LASIK-FS group, 15.53±1.65 for PRK, and 16.10±1.54 for ReLEx SMILE. When corneal densitometry was analyzed for specific corneal areas, the values corresponding to the 0–2, 2–6, and 6–10 mm annuli were similar across the three surgical techniques. The only region in which differences were found was the peripheral area ( P
ISSN:0950-222X
1476-5454
DOI:10.1038/eye.2017.107