Interstitial IgG antibody pharmacokinetics assessed by combined in vivo‐ and physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic modelling approaches

Key points For therapeutic antibodies, total tissue concentrations are frequently reported as a lump sum measure of the antibody in residual plasma, interstitial fluid and cells. In terms of correlating antibody exposure to a therapeutic effect, however, interstitial pharmacokinetics might be more r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of physiology 2017-12, Vol.595 (24), p.7311-7330
Hauptverfasser: Eigenmann, Miro J., Karlsen, Tine V., Krippendorff, Ben‐Fillippo, Tenstad, Olav, Fronton, Ludivine, Otteneder, Michael B., Wiig, Helge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Key points For therapeutic antibodies, total tissue concentrations are frequently reported as a lump sum measure of the antibody in residual plasma, interstitial fluid and cells. In terms of correlating antibody exposure to a therapeutic effect, however, interstitial pharmacokinetics might be more relevant. In the present study, we collected total tissue and interstitial antibody biodistribution data in mice and assessed the composition of tissue samples aiming to correct total tissue measurements for plasma and cellular content. All data and parameters were integrated into a refined physiologically‐based pharmacokinetic model for monoclonal antibodies to enable the tissue‐specific description of antibody pharmacokinetics in the interstitial space. We found that antibody interstitial concentrations are highly tissue‐specific and dependent on the underlying capillary structure but, in several tissues, they reach relatively high interstitial concentrations, contradicting the still‐prevailing view that both the distribution to tissues and the interstitial concentrations for antibodies are generally low. For most therapeutic antibodies, the interstitium is the target space. Although experimental methods for measuring antibody pharmacokinetics (PK) in this space are not well established, thus making quantitative assessment difficult, the interstitial antibody concentration is assumed to be low. In the present study, we combined direct quantification of antibodies in the interstitial fluid with a physiologically‐based PK (PBPK) modelling approach, with the aim of better describing the PK of monoclonal antibodies in the interstitial space of different tissues. We isolated interstitial fluid by tissue centrifugation and conducted an antibody biodistribution study in mice, measuring total tissue and interstitial concentrations in selected tissues. Residual plasma, interstitial volumes and lymph flows, which are important PBPK model parameters, were assessed in vivo. We could thereby refine the PBPK modelling of monoclonal antibodies, better interpret antibody biodistribution data and more accurately predict their PK in the different tissue spaces. Our results indicate that, in tissues with discontinuous capillaries (liver and spleen), interstitial concentrations are reflected by the plasma concentration. In tissues with continuous capillaries (e.g. skin and muscle), ∼50–60% of the plasma concentration is found in the interstitial space. In the brain and kidney, on
ISSN:0022-3751
1469-7793
DOI:10.1113/JP274819