Dosimetric perturbation from cloth and paper gowns for total skin electron irradiation

Traditionally, total skin electron patients remove all clothing for treatment. It is generally assumed that this is best for the treatment of superficial skin lesions out of concern clothing may significantly perturb dose. We investigate the dosimetric effect of patient gowns and determine the neces...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2013-07, Vol.14 (4), p.272-277
Hauptverfasser: Steinman, James P., Hopkins, Shane L., Wang, Iris Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Traditionally, total skin electron patients remove all clothing for treatment. It is generally assumed that this is best for the treatment of superficial skin lesions out of concern clothing may significantly perturb dose. We investigate the dosimetric effect of patient gowns and determine the necessity of treating patients naked. Using GAFCHROMIC EBT2 film, dose to a cylindrical phantom was measured with cloth, paper, and tri‐layer cloth gowns, compared to no covering. A 6 MeV electron beam with spoiler accessory was used at ∼4 meters source‐to‐skin distance. The gantry was angled at 248° and 292°. The phantom was rotated at ‐60°, 0°, and 60° relative to the beam's central axis, simulating the Stanford technique. This was also repeated for films sandwiched between the phantom's discs. Using a Markus chamber, the effect of air gaps of 0 to 5 cm in cloth and paper gowns was measured. The water‐equivalent attenuation of the gowns was determined through transmission studies. Compared to no covering, films placed on the phantom surface revealed an average increase of 0.8% in dose for cloth, 1.8% for tri‐layered cloth, and 0.7% for paper. Films sandwiched within the phantom showed only slight shift of the percent depth‐dose curves. Markus chamber readings revealed 1.4% for tri‐layered cloth, and
ISSN:1526-9914
1526-9914
DOI:10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4045