Comparison among criteria to define successful weight-loss maintainers and regainers in the Action for Health in Diabetes (Look AHEAD) and Diabetes Prevention Program trials

Given the low rates of successful weight maintenance after lifestyle-induced weight loss, it is critical to develop approaches that distinguish successful weight-loss maintainers from regainers. The aim of this study was to compare published categorization criteria that differentiate maintainers and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of clinical nutrition 2017-12, Vol.106 (6), p.1337-1346
Hauptverfasser: Berger, Samantha E, Huggins, Gordon S, McCaffery, Jeanne M, Lichtenstein, Alice H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Given the low rates of successful weight maintenance after lifestyle-induced weight loss, it is critical to develop approaches that distinguish successful weight-loss maintainers from regainers. The aim of this study was to compare published categorization criteria that differentiate maintainers and regainers via quantitative agreement. The study used publicly available data from Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes; n = 1791) and Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP; n = 613) participants with ≥3% initial weight loss after lifestyle interventions and 4-y follow-up data. Eight previously published criteria defining maintainers and regainers were compared with respect to number of participants and concordance via agreement statistics. Criteria were assessed separately among those with 3–9% and ≥10% initial weight loss. Regainers had higher body weight at year 4 than did maintainers (mean difference range: 6.6–11.9 kg in Look AHEAD; 11.5–14.6 kg in DPP; P < 0.0001). Assessing concordance among criteria, agreement was dependent on initial weight loss. Among those with 3–9% initial weight loss in both cohorts, 9 of 28 comparisons were concordant (agreement ≥80%). Among those with ≥10% initial weight loss, 7 of 28 comparisons in Look AHEAD and 13 of 28 in the DPP were in high agreement. The definition of successful weight-loss maintenance “regaining ≤25% of initial weight loss during maintenance” showed high agreement with the most commonly used definition of “staying ≥10% below initial weight” among those with ≥10% initial weight loss (agreement: 85.0% in Look AHEAD; 87.4% in DPP). The same definition of ≤25% regain showed high agreement with the definition of staying ≥5% below initial weight among those with 3–9% initial weight loss (agreement: 91.6% in Look AHEAD; 90.5% in DPP). Although all of the criteria discriminated on the basis of weight loss, many showed low agreement, which limited cross-study comparisons. Among criteria with high agreement, the definition of successful weight maintenance “regaining ≤25% of initial weight loss during maintenance” is a preferred definition of success, given the realistic challenges of maintaining 100% weight loss and flexible application in populations with high initial weight-loss variations. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00017953 (Look AHEAD) and NCT00004992 (DPP).
ISSN:0002-9165
1938-3207
DOI:10.3945/ajcn.117.157446