Centralized patient‐reported outcome data collection in transplantation is feasible and clinically meaningful

BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) cures many patients, but often with the risk of late effects and impaired quality of life. The value of quantifying patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) is increasingly being recognized, but the routine collection of PROs is uncommon. This study evaluated the feasibility of prospective PRO collection by an outcome registry at multiple time points from unselected HCT patients undergoing transplantation at centers contributing clinical data to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), and then it correlated the PRO data with clinical and demographic data. METHODS The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT‐BMT), 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey (SF‐36), and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory measures were administered before HCT, on day 100, and at 6 and 12 months. Patients were recruited by the transplant center, but posttransplant PRO collection was managed centrally by the CIBMTR. RESULTS There were 580 eligible patients, and 390 (67%) enrolled. Feasibility was shown by high time‐specific retention rates (176 of 238 at 1 year or 74%) and participant satisfaction. Factors associated with higher response rates were an age > 50 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03‐2.41; P = .0355), white race (OR, 4.61; 95% CI, 2.66‐7.99; P