Circulating and intraprostatic sex steroid hormonal profiles in relation to male pattern baldness and chest hair density among men diagnosed with localized prostate cancers

Background Prospective cohort studies of circulating sex steroid hormones and prostate cancer risk have not provided a consistent association, despite evidence from animal and clinical studies. However, studies using male pattern baldness as a proxy of early‐life or cumulative androgen exposure have...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Prostate 2017-12, Vol.77 (16), p.1573-1582
Hauptverfasser: Zhou, Cindy Ke, Stanczyk, Frank Z., Hafi, Muhannad, Veneroso, Carmela C., Lynch, Barlow, Falk, Roni T., Niwa, Shelley, Emanuel, Eric, Gao, Yu‐Tang, Hemstreet, George P., Zolfghari, Ladan, Carroll, Peter R., Manyak, Michael J., Sesterhenn, Isabell A., Levine, Paul H., Hsing, Ann W., Cook, Michael B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Prospective cohort studies of circulating sex steroid hormones and prostate cancer risk have not provided a consistent association, despite evidence from animal and clinical studies. However, studies using male pattern baldness as a proxy of early‐life or cumulative androgen exposure have reported significant associations with aggressive and fatal prostate cancer risk. Given that androgens underlie the development of patterned hair loss and chest hair, we assessed whether these two dermatological characteristics were associated with circulating and intraprostatic concentrations of sex steroid hormones among men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer. Methods We included 248 prostate cancer patients from the NCI Prostate Tissue Study, who answered surveys and provided a pre‐treatment blood sample as well as fresh frozen adjacent normal prostate tissue. Male pattern baldness and chest hair density were assessed by trained nurses before surgery. General linear models estimated geometric means and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) of each hormone variable by dermatological phenotype with adjustment for potential confounding variables. Subgroup analyses were performed by Gleason score (
ISSN:0270-4137
1097-0045
DOI:10.1002/pros.23433