Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Usual Care for Smoking Cessation

Mechanisms Underlying Mindfulness-Based Addiction Treatment Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Usual Care for Smoking Cessation

Objective: To examine cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying mindfulness-based addiction treatment (MBAT) versus cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and usual care (UC) for smoking cessation. Method: Participants in the parent study from which data were drawn (N = 412; 54.9% female; 48.2% Afri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 2017-11, Vol.85 (11), p.1029-1040
Hauptverfasser: Spears, Claire Adams, Hedeker, Donald, Li, Liang, Wu, Cai, Anderson, Natalie K., Houchins, Sean C., Vinci, Christine, Hoover, Diana Stewart, Vidrine, Jennifer Irvin, Cinciripini, Paul M., Waters, Andrew J., Wetter, David W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Abstinence
Addiction Treatment
Addictions
Adult
African Americans
Attentional Bias
Behavior modification
Behavior, Addictive - psychology
Behavior, Addictive - therapy
Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Cognitive therapy
Craving
Drug Addiction
Drug Dependency
Drug Withdrawal
Emotions
Female
Human
Humans
Indirect effects
Male
Medical research
Mindfulness
Mindfulness - methods
Negative emotions
Nicotine
Perceived control
Psychosocial factors
Self Efficacy
Smoking
Smoking - psychology
Smoking - therapy
Smoking Cessation
Smoking Cessation - methods
Smoking Cessation - psychology
Stress
Tobacco
Tobacco Use Disorder - psychology
Tobacco Use Disorder - therapy
Treatment
Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To examine cognitive and affective mechanisms underlying mindfulness-based addiction treatment (MBAT) versus cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and usual care (UC) for smoking cessation. Method: Participants in the parent study from which data were drawn (N = 412; 54.9% female; 48.2% African American, 41.5% non-Latino White, 5.4% Latino, 4.9% other; 57.6% annual income
ISSN:0022-006X
1939-2117
DOI:10.1037/ccp0000229