Cost benefits of rapid recanalization using intraarterial thrombectomy
Objectives Thrombolytic therapy is associated with favorable clinical outcomes after successful and rapid recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the cost benefits and clinical outcomes at 1 year after intraarterial thrombectomy (IAT) by the rapidity of th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Brain and behavior 2017-10, Vol.7 (10), p.e00830-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
Thrombolytic therapy is associated with favorable clinical outcomes after successful and rapid recanalization in patients with acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to evaluate the cost benefits and clinical outcomes at 1 year after intraarterial thrombectomy (IAT) by the rapidity of the successful recanalization.
Materials & Methods
Clinical outcomes of and medical costs incurred by 230 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent IAT were compared by the rapidity from symptom onset to successful recanalization (2b/3 thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade): ≤6‐hr (n = 143), >6‐hr (n = 31), and no‐recanalization (n = 56). Clinical outcomes including functional independence (0–2 modified Rankin Score), mortality, and home‐discharge checked at 1 year post‐IAT were compared among the three groups. Cost utility was calculated using quality‐adjusted life years (QALY) estimated using the EuroQol‐5 dimensions‐3 levels questionnaire and the fees paid for institutional rehabilitation during the year post‐IAT, and, was compared among the groups.
Results
Patients in the ≤6‐hr group showed higher functional independence (≤6‐hr, 70%; >6‐hr, 40%; no‐recanalization, 6%, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2162-3279 2162-3279 |
DOI: | 10.1002/brb3.830 |