Rigor, Reproducibility and in vitro CSF assays: The Devil in the Details

Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research. 1 When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established. In their recent paper in An...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of neurology 2017-06, Vol.81 (6), p.904-907
Hauptverfasser: Moody, Olivia A., Talwar, Sahil, Jenkins, Meagan A., Freeman, Amanda A., Trotti, Lynn Marie, García, Paul S., Bliwise, Donald, Lynch, Joseph W., Cherson, Brad, Hernandez, Eric M, Feldman, Neil, Saini, Prabhjyot, Rye, David B., Jenkins, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 907
container_issue 6
container_start_page 904
container_title Annals of neurology
container_volume 81
creator Moody, Olivia A.
Talwar, Sahil
Jenkins, Meagan A.
Freeman, Amanda A.
Trotti, Lynn Marie
García, Paul S.
Bliwise, Donald
Lynch, Joseph W.
Cherson, Brad
Hernandez, Eric M
Feldman, Neil
Saini, Prabhjyot
Rye, David B.
Jenkins, Andrew
description Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research. 1 When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established. In their recent paper in Annals of Neurology , Dauvilliers et al 2 challenged our earlier finding that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from some patients with unexplained excessive daytime sleepiness enhances the activation of GABA A receptors (GABA A -R) 3 . They present data from 15 subjects in which they were unable to find evidence of enhanced activation of GABA A receptors. Here we: 1) establish how flaws in Dauvilliers’ experimental design account for this difference; 2) present new data demonstrating the robustness and reproducibility of our methods and 3) summarize the clinical promise of GABA A -R antagonism in treating IH and related disorders.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ana.24940
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmedcentral</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5639705</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5639705</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_56397053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqljMtOwzAQAFcIREPhwB_4A0hZx05oOHApVD23vVvbxrSLXDuy3Uj5ex7iwpnTaDTSANxLnEnE6pE8zSrdaryAQtZKlvMvu4QCVaPLWio9gZuUPhCxbSRew6Saa42oVAGrNR9CfBBr28fQnfe8Y8d5FOQ7wV4MnGMQi81SUEo0pmexPVrxagd23zn_SCZ26Rau3skle_fLKbws37aLVdmfdyfb7a3PkZzpI58ojiYQm7_F89EcwmDqRrVPWKt_Dz4BxBBY4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rigor, Reproducibility and in vitro CSF assays: The Devil in the Details</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Moody, Olivia A. ; Talwar, Sahil ; Jenkins, Meagan A. ; Freeman, Amanda A. ; Trotti, Lynn Marie ; García, Paul S. ; Bliwise, Donald ; Lynch, Joseph W. ; Cherson, Brad ; Hernandez, Eric M ; Feldman, Neil ; Saini, Prabhjyot ; Rye, David B. ; Jenkins, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Moody, Olivia A. ; Talwar, Sahil ; Jenkins, Meagan A. ; Freeman, Amanda A. ; Trotti, Lynn Marie ; García, Paul S. ; Bliwise, Donald ; Lynch, Joseph W. ; Cherson, Brad ; Hernandez, Eric M ; Feldman, Neil ; Saini, Prabhjyot ; Rye, David B. ; Jenkins, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research. 1 When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established. In their recent paper in Annals of Neurology , Dauvilliers et al 2 challenged our earlier finding that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from some patients with unexplained excessive daytime sleepiness enhances the activation of GABA A receptors (GABA A -R) 3 . They present data from 15 subjects in which they were unable to find evidence of enhanced activation of GABA A receptors. Here we: 1) establish how flaws in Dauvilliers’ experimental design account for this difference; 2) present new data demonstrating the robustness and reproducibility of our methods and 3) summarize the clinical promise of GABA A -R antagonism in treating IH and related disorders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-5134</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-8249</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ana.24940</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28440033</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Annals of neurology, 2017-06, Vol.81 (6), p.904-907</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27926,27927</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moody, Olivia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sahil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Meagan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Amanda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trotti, Lynn Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliwise, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherson, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Prabhjyot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rye, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Rigor, Reproducibility and in vitro CSF assays: The Devil in the Details</title><title>Annals of neurology</title><description>Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research. 1 When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established. In their recent paper in Annals of Neurology , Dauvilliers et al 2 challenged our earlier finding that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from some patients with unexplained excessive daytime sleepiness enhances the activation of GABA A receptors (GABA A -R) 3 . They present data from 15 subjects in which they were unable to find evidence of enhanced activation of GABA A receptors. Here we: 1) establish how flaws in Dauvilliers’ experimental design account for this difference; 2) present new data demonstrating the robustness and reproducibility of our methods and 3) summarize the clinical promise of GABA A -R antagonism in treating IH and related disorders.</description><issn>0364-5134</issn><issn>1531-8249</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqljMtOwzAQAFcIREPhwB_4A0hZx05oOHApVD23vVvbxrSLXDuy3Uj5ex7iwpnTaDTSANxLnEnE6pE8zSrdaryAQtZKlvMvu4QCVaPLWio9gZuUPhCxbSRew6Saa42oVAGrNR9CfBBr28fQnfe8Y8d5FOQ7wV4MnGMQi81SUEo0pmexPVrxagd23zn_SCZ26Rau3skle_fLKbws37aLVdmfdyfb7a3PkZzpI58ojiYQm7_F89EcwmDqRrVPWKt_Dz4BxBBY4A</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Moody, Olivia A.</creator><creator>Talwar, Sahil</creator><creator>Jenkins, Meagan A.</creator><creator>Freeman, Amanda A.</creator><creator>Trotti, Lynn Marie</creator><creator>García, Paul S.</creator><creator>Bliwise, Donald</creator><creator>Lynch, Joseph W.</creator><creator>Cherson, Brad</creator><creator>Hernandez, Eric M</creator><creator>Feldman, Neil</creator><creator>Saini, Prabhjyot</creator><creator>Rye, David B.</creator><creator>Jenkins, Andrew</creator><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Rigor, Reproducibility and in vitro CSF assays: The Devil in the Details</title><author>Moody, Olivia A. ; Talwar, Sahil ; Jenkins, Meagan A. ; Freeman, Amanda A. ; Trotti, Lynn Marie ; García, Paul S. ; Bliwise, Donald ; Lynch, Joseph W. ; Cherson, Brad ; Hernandez, Eric M ; Feldman, Neil ; Saini, Prabhjyot ; Rye, David B. ; Jenkins, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_56397053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moody, Olivia A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sahil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Meagan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Amanda A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trotti, Lynn Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García, Paul S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bliwise, Donald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherson, Brad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, Eric M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feldman, Neil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Prabhjyot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rye, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Annals of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moody, Olivia A.</au><au>Talwar, Sahil</au><au>Jenkins, Meagan A.</au><au>Freeman, Amanda A.</au><au>Trotti, Lynn Marie</au><au>García, Paul S.</au><au>Bliwise, Donald</au><au>Lynch, Joseph W.</au><au>Cherson, Brad</au><au>Hernandez, Eric M</au><au>Feldman, Neil</au><au>Saini, Prabhjyot</au><au>Rye, David B.</au><au>Jenkins, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rigor, Reproducibility and in vitro CSF assays: The Devil in the Details</atitle><jtitle>Annals of neurology</jtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>904</spage><epage>907</epage><pages>904-907</pages><issn>0364-5134</issn><eissn>1531-8249</eissn><abstract>Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research. 1 When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established. In their recent paper in Annals of Neurology , Dauvilliers et al 2 challenged our earlier finding that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from some patients with unexplained excessive daytime sleepiness enhances the activation of GABA A receptors (GABA A -R) 3 . They present data from 15 subjects in which they were unable to find evidence of enhanced activation of GABA A receptors. Here we: 1) establish how flaws in Dauvilliers’ experimental design account for this difference; 2) present new data demonstrating the robustness and reproducibility of our methods and 3) summarize the clinical promise of GABA A -R antagonism in treating IH and related disorders.</abstract><pmid>28440033</pmid><doi>10.1002/ana.24940</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-5134
ispartof Annals of neurology, 2017-06, Vol.81 (6), p.904-907
issn 0364-5134
1531-8249
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5639705
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title Rigor, Reproducibility and in vitro CSF assays: The Devil in the Details
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T12%3A10%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmedcentral&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rigor,%20Reproducibility%20and%20in%20vitro%20CSF%20assays:%20The%20Devil%20in%20the%20Details&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20neurology&rft.au=Moody,%20Olivia%20A.&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=907&rft.pages=904-907&rft.issn=0364-5134&rft.eissn=1531-8249&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ana.24940&rft_dat=%3Cpubmedcentral%3Epubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5639705%3C/pubmedcentral%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/28440033&rfr_iscdi=true