Rigor, Reproducibility and in vitro CSF assays: The Devil in the Details

Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research. 1 When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established. In their recent paper in An...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of neurology 2017-06, Vol.81 (6), p.904-907
Hauptverfasser: Moody, Olivia A., Talwar, Sahil, Jenkins, Meagan A., Freeman, Amanda A., Trotti, Lynn Marie, García, Paul S., Bliwise, Donald, Lynch, Joseph W., Cherson, Brad, Hernandez, Eric M, Feldman, Neil, Saini, Prabhjyot, Rye, David B., Jenkins, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research. 1 When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established. In their recent paper in Annals of Neurology , Dauvilliers et al 2 challenged our earlier finding that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from some patients with unexplained excessive daytime sleepiness enhances the activation of GABA A receptors (GABA A -R) 3 . They present data from 15 subjects in which they were unable to find evidence of enhanced activation of GABA A receptors. Here we: 1) establish how flaws in Dauvilliers’ experimental design account for this difference; 2) present new data demonstrating the robustness and reproducibility of our methods and 3) summarize the clinical promise of GABA A -R antagonism in treating IH and related disorders.
ISSN:0364-5134
1531-8249
DOI:10.1002/ana.24940