Rigor, Reproducibility and in vitro CSF assays: The Devil in the Details
Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research. 1 When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established. In their recent paper in An...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of neurology 2017-06, Vol.81 (6), p.904-907 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Divergent results and misinterpretation of non-significant findings remain problematic in science – especially in retrospective, hypothesis generating, translational research.
1
When such divergence occurs, it is imperative that the cause of the divergence be established.
In their recent paper in
Annals of Neurology
, Dauvilliers
et al
2
challenged our earlier finding that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from some patients with unexplained excessive daytime sleepiness enhances the activation of GABA
A
receptors (GABA
A
-R)
3
. They present data from 15 subjects in which they were unable to find evidence of enhanced activation of GABA
A
receptors. Here we: 1) establish how flaws in Dauvilliers’ experimental design account for this difference; 2) present new data demonstrating the robustness and reproducibility of our methods and 3) summarize the clinical promise of GABA
A
-R antagonism in treating IH and related disorders. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0364-5134 1531-8249 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ana.24940 |