Radiation reduction during percutaneous coronary intervention: A new protocol with a low frame rate and selective fluoroscopic image storage

The percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure is associated with potentially high levels of radiation exposure and therefore increased risk of adverse radiation-induced outcomes, ranging from cataract to malignancy. Frame rate reduction and selective fluoroscopy storage may help reduce radi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medicine (Baltimore) 2017-07, Vol.96 (30), p.e7517-e7517
Hauptverfasser: Chon, Min Ku, Chun, Kook Jin, Lee, Dae Sung, Lee, Soo Yong, Hwang, Jongmin, Lee, Sang Hyun, Hwang, Ki Won, Kim, Jeong Su, Park, Young Huyn, Kim, June Hong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure is associated with potentially high levels of radiation exposure and therefore increased risk of adverse radiation-induced outcomes, ranging from cataract to malignancy. Frame rate reduction and selective fluoroscopy storage may help reduce radiation exposure. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a radiation reduction protocol that uses a lower frame rate and selective storage of fluoroscopic images in terms of its effect on reducing the radiation dose during PCI.The new protocol incorporated a lower frame rate as compared with the conventional protocol, and used selective storage of fluoroscopic images. We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent PCI under the conventional protocol from January 2013 to December 2013, and compared them with those who underwent PCI with the new protocol from January 2015 to December 2015. The primary endpoint was radiation dose reduction expressed as cumulative air kerma and dose-area product (DAP). The image quality was assessed by 3 independent well-trained cardiologists.One hundred fifty-five patients were enrolled in the conventional protocol group, and 152 were enrolled in the radiation reduction protocol group (total, n = 307). There was no statistical significance in terms of the baseline characteristics, including body mass index. Overall, the radiation reduction protocol group showed a significant reduction in both cumulative air kerma (1634.39 ± 717.95 vs 2074.75 ± 1003.72 mGy, P 
ISSN:0025-7974
1536-5964
DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000007517