Nurses' Use of Race in Clinical Decision Making

Purpose To examine nurses’ self‐reported use of race in clinical evaluation. Design This cross‐sectional study analyzed data collected from three separate studies using the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey, which includes items about use of race and genomic information in nursing pra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of nursing scholarship 2016-11, Vol.48 (6), p.577-586
Hauptverfasser: Sellers, Sherrill L., Moss, Melissa E., Calzone, Kathleen, Abdallah, Khadijah E., Jenkins, Jean F., Bonham, Vence L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To examine nurses’ self‐reported use of race in clinical evaluation. Design This cross‐sectional study analyzed data collected from three separate studies using the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey, which includes items about use of race and genomic information in nursing practice. The Racial Attributes in Clinical Evaluation (RACE) scale was used to measure explicit clinical use of race among nurses from across the United States. Methods Multivariate regression analysis was used to examine associations between RACE score and individual‐level characteristics and beliefs in 5,733 registered nurses. Findings Analysis revealed significant relationships between RACE score and nurses’ race and ethnicity, educational level, and views on the clinical importance of patient demographic characteristics. Asian nurses reported RACE scores 1.41 points higher than White nurses (p < .001), and Black nurses reported RACE scores 0.55 points higher than White nurses (p < .05). Compared to diploma‐level nurses, the baccalaureate‐level nurses reported 0.69 points higher RACE scores (p < .05), master's‐level nurses reported 1.63 points higher RACE scores (p < .001), and doctorate‐level nurses reported 1.77 points higher RACE scores (p < .01). In terms of clinical importance of patient characteristics, patient race and ethnicity corresponded to a 0.54‐point increase in RACE score (p < .001), patient genes to a 0.21‐point increase in RACE score (p < .001), patient family history to a 0.15‐point increase in RACE score (p < .01), and patient age to a 0.19‐point increase in RACE score (p < .001). Conclusions Higher reported use of race among minority nurses may be due, in part, to differential levels of racial self‐awareness. A relatively linear positive relationship between level of nursing degree nursing education and use of race suggests that a stronger foundation of knowledge about genetic ancestry, population genetics and the concept “race” and genetic ancestry may increase in clinical decision making could allow nurses to more appropriately use of race in clinical care. Integrating patient demographic characteristics into clinical decisions is an important component of nursing practice. Clinical Relevance Registered nurses provide care for diverse racial and ethnic patient populations and stand on the front line of clinical care, making them essential for reducing racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare delivery. Exploring registered nurses’ indivi
ISSN:1527-6546
1547-5069
DOI:10.1111/jnu.12251