Morbidity and Health Risk Factors Among New Mexico Miners: A Comparison Across Mining Sectors

OBJECTIVE:This study examines differences in chronic health outcomes between coal, uranium, metal, and nonmetal miners. METHODS:In a cross-sectional study using data from a health screening program for current and former New Mexico miners, log-binomial logistic regression models were used to estimat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of occupational and environmental medicine 2017-08, Vol.59 (8), p.789-794
Hauptverfasser: Shumate, Alice M., Yeoman, Kristin, Victoroff, Tristan, Evans, Kandace, Karr, Roger, Sanchez, Tami, Sood, Akshay, Laney, Anthony Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVE:This study examines differences in chronic health outcomes between coal, uranium, metal, and nonmetal miners. METHODS:In a cross-sectional study using data from a health screening program for current and former New Mexico miners, log-binomial logistic regression models were used to estimate relative risks of respiratory and heart disease, cancer, osteoarthritis, and back pain associated with mining in each sector as compared with coal, adjusting for other relevant risk factors. RESULTS:Differential risks in angina, pulmonary symptoms, asthma, cancer, osteoarthritis, and back pain between mining sectors were found. CONCLUSIONS:New Mexico miners experience different chronic health challenges across sectors. These results demonstrate the importance of using comparable data to understand how health risks differ across mining sectors. Further investigation among a broader geographic population of miners will help identify the health priorities and needs in each sector.
ISSN:1076-2752
1536-5948
DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000001078