Effectiveness of implementing a dyadic psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients and family caregivers

Purpose This study examined the effectiveness, feasibility, and satisfaction with implementation of the FOCUS program in two US Cancer Support Community affiliates in Ohio and California as well as the cost to deliver the program. FOCUS is an evidence-based psychoeducational intervention for dyads (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2017-11, Vol.25 (11), p.3395-3406
Hauptverfasser: Titler, Marita G., Visovatti, Moira A., Shuman, Clayton, Ellis, Katrina R., Banerjee, Tanima, Dockham, Bonnie, Yakusheva, Olga, Northouse, Laurel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study examined the effectiveness, feasibility, and satisfaction with implementation of the FOCUS program in two US Cancer Support Community affiliates in Ohio and California as well as the cost to deliver the program. FOCUS is an evidence-based psychoeducational intervention for dyads (cancer patients and caregivers). Methods A pre-post-intervention design was employed. Eleven, five-session Focus programs were delivered by licensed professionals in a small group format (three–four dyads/group) to 36 patient-caregiver dyads. An Implementation Training Manual, a FOCUS Intervention Protocol Manual, and weekly conference calls were used to foster implementation. Participants completed questionnaires prior to and following completion of each five-session FOCUS program to measure primary (emotional distress, quality of life) and secondary outcomes (benefits of illness, self-efficacy, and dyadic communication). Enrollment and retention rates and fidelity to FOCUS were used to measure feasibility. Cost estimates were based on time and median hourly wages. Repeated analysis of variance was used to analyze the effect of FOCUS on outcomes for dyads. Descriptive statistics were used to examine feasibility, satisfaction, and cost estimates. Results FOCUS had positive effects on QOL ( p  = .014), emotional ( p  = .012), and functional ( p  = .049) well-being, emotional distress ( p  = .002), benefits of illness ( p  = .013), and self-efficacy ( p  = .001). Intervention fidelity was 85% with enrollment and retention rates of 71.4 and 90%, respectively. Participants were highly satisfied. Cost for oversight and delivery of the five-session FOCUS program was $168.00 per dyad. Conclusions FOCUS is an economic and effective intervention to decrease distress and improve the quality of life for dyads.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-017-3758-9