Student‐derived solutions to address barriers hindering reports of unprofessional behaviour

Background Barriers hinder medical students from reporting breaches in professional behaviour, which can adversely impact institutional culture. No studies have reported student perspectives on how to address these barriers successfully. Our study (i) evaluated the likelihood of reporting based on v...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical education 2017-07, Vol.51 (7), p.708-717
Hauptverfasser: Kohn, Jaden R, Armstrong, Joseph M, Taylor, Rachel A, Whitney, Diana L, Gill, Anne C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Barriers hinder medical students from reporting breaches in professional behaviour, which can adversely impact institutional culture. No studies have reported student perspectives on how to address these barriers successfully. Our study (i) evaluated the likelihood of reporting based on violation severity, (ii) assessed barriers to reporting and (iii) elicited students’ proposed solutions. Methods Four medical students designed a cross‐sectional study in 2015. In response to seven scenarios, students rated the likelihood of reporting the violation, indicated perceived barriers and identified solutions. Additional questions investigated the perceived importance of professionalism, confidence in understanding professionalism and trust in administrative protection from negative consequences. Results Two hundred and seventy‐two students in their clinical years (MS2–4) responded to the survey (RR = 50%). Students were 70–90% likely to report major violations, but < 30% likely to report minor or moderate violations. Barriers included concerns about an uncomfortable relationship (41%), potential negative repercussions on grades or opportunities (23%), and addressing by direct discussion rather than reporting (23%). Solutions included simplified reporting, control over report release date, improved feedback to reporters, training for real‐time resolution of concerns and a neutral resource to help students triage concerns. No differences existed between classes regarding the importance or understanding of professionalism. In linear regression, only importance of professionalism predicted likelihood of reporting and this did not change with training. Conclusions Hindered by common barriers, students are unlikely to report a violation unless it is a serious breach of professionalism. Student‐derived solutions should be explored by medical school administrators to encourage reporting of violation of professionalism.
ISSN:0308-0110
1365-2923
DOI:10.1111/medu.13271