Complete Responses to Mitotane in Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma—A New Look at an Old Drug

Purpose Based largely on reports that predate modern reporting standards, mitotane has been considered a systemic treatment option for both hormone control and antitumor control of metastatic adrenocortical cancer (ACC), although the therapeutic window is narrow. Methods We searched electronic medic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The oncologist (Dayton, Ohio) Ohio), 2017-09, Vol.22 (9), p.1102-1106
Hauptverfasser: Reidy‐Lagunes, Diane L., Lung, Betty, Untch, Brian R., Raj, Nitya, Hrabovsky, Anastasia, Kelly, Ciara, Gerst, Scott, Katz, Seth, Kampel, Lewis, Chou, Joanne, Gopalan, Anu, Saltz, Leonard B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Based largely on reports that predate modern reporting standards, mitotane has been considered a systemic treatment option for both hormone control and antitumor control of metastatic adrenocortical cancer (ACC), although the therapeutic window is narrow. Methods We searched electronic medical records to identify patients with metastatic ACC treated and prescribed single‐agent mitotane at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from March 15, 1989–September 18, 2015. Reference radiologists reviewed all imaging and determined efficacy according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Patient demographics, toxicities, and treatment outcomes were reviewed. Next‐generation sequencing was performed in selected cases. Results Thirty‐six patients were identified. The mean age was 54 and 50% had functional tumors. Grade 3 or greater toxicities were documented in 16 out of 36 patients (44%) and 17% had documented long term adrenal insufficiency. Progression of the disease as the best response occurred in 30 out of 36 patients (83%) and one patient (3%) experienced clinical progression. Three patients achieved a complete response (CR) (8%), one patient achieved a partial response (3%), and one patient (3%) had stable disease after slow disease progression prior to initiation of therapy (durable for 6 months). All responders had nonfunctional tumors. Next‐generation sequencing in two of the three CR patients was performed and failed to identify any novel alterations. Conclusion In this retrospective series, mitotane had a low response rate and low tumor control rate; however, a disproportionately high complete response rate suggested it should be used in selected individuals. Adrenal insufficiency is common with mitotane use and aggressive treatment with steroid supplementation should be considered when appropriate to avoid excess toxicities. Biomarkers are desperately needed to further define this disease. Implications for Practice This is the first objective report of single‐agent mitotane using modern objective criteria. Although the vast majority of patients did not respond (and toxicity was high), we identified a remarkable 8% complete response rate (i.e. cure) in biopsy proven stage IV adrenocortical cancer patients. Biomarkers are desperately needed for this rare disease. The management of adrenocortical cancer is challenging because of limited therapies, heterogeneous clinical presentations, and varying degree of aggressiveness at diagnosi
ISSN:1083-7159
1549-490X
DOI:10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0459