The utility and value of the "surprise question" for patients with serious illness
Clinicians have long identified the challenges of accurately making a prognosis as being a barrier to patient access to end-of-life care,1 and many tools have been developed to help clinicians with the process.2 These tools generally rely on algorithms that can be complex and not easily used in a cl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian Medical Association journal (CMAJ) 2017-08, Vol.189 (33), p.E1072-E1073 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Clinicians have long identified the challenges of accurately making a prognosis as being a barrier to patient access to end-of-life care,1 and many tools have been developed to help clinicians with the process.2 These tools generally rely on algorithms that can be complex and not easily used in a clinical setting, but as noted in a recent systematic review by Downar and colleagues,3 the surprise question ("Would I be surprised if this patient were to die within the next 12 months?") has gained support as a simple, practical way of identifying patients at high risk of dying.Putting hospice and palliative care together as being only appropriate for the end-of-life care is misleading.Can we predict which hospitalised patients are in their last year of life? A prospective cross-sectional study of the Gold Standards Framework Prognostic Indicator Guidance as a screening tool in the acute hospital setting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0820-3946 1488-2329 |
DOI: | 10.1503/cmaj.733231 |