Perioperative antiplatelet therapy and cardiovascular outcomes in patients undergoing joint and spine surgery

Abstract Study objective Perioperative thrombotic complications after orthopedic surgery are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The use of aspirin to reduce perioperative cardiovascular complications in certain high-risk cohorts remains controversial. Few studies have addressed asp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2016-12, Vol.35, p.163-169
Hauptverfasser: Smilowitz, Nathaniel R., MD, Oberweis, Brandon S., MD, Nukala, Swetha, MBBS, Rosenberg, Andrew, MD, Stuchin, Steven, MD, Iorio, Richard, MD, Errico, Thomas, MD, Radford, Martha J., MD, Berger, Jeffrey S., MD, MS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Study objective Perioperative thrombotic complications after orthopedic surgery are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The use of aspirin to reduce perioperative cardiovascular complications in certain high-risk cohorts remains controversial. Few studies have addressed aspirin use, bleeding, and cardiovascular outcomes among high-risk patients undergoing joint and spine surgery. Design/setting/patients We performed a retrospective comparison of adults undergoing knee, hip, or spine surgery at a tertiary care center during 2 periods between November 2008 and December 2009 (reference period) and between April 2013 and December 2013 (contemporary period). Measurements Patient demographics, comorbidities, management, and outcomes were ascertained using hospital datasets. Main results A total of 5690 participants underwent 3075 joint and spine surgeries in the reference period and 2791 surgeries in the contemporary period. Mean age was 61 ± 13 years, and 59% were female. In the overall population, incidence of myocardial injury (3.1% vs 5.8%, P < .0001), hemorrhage (0.2% vs 0.8%, P = .0009), and red blood cell transfusion (17.2% vs 24.8%, P < .001) were lower in the contemporary period. Among 614 participants with a preoperative diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD), in-hospital aspirin use was significantly higher in the contemporary period (66% vs 30.7%, P < .0001); numerically, fewer participants developed myocardial injury (13.5% vs 19.3%, P = .05), had hemorrhage (0.3% vs 2.1%, P = .0009), and had red blood cell transfusion (37.2% vs 44.2%, P < .001) in the contemporary vs reference period. Conclusions In a large tertiary care center, the incidence of perioperative bleeding and cardiovascular events decreased over time. In participants with CAD, perioperative aspirin use increased and appears to be safe.
ISSN:0952-8180
1873-4529
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.028