Improvement of recovery parameters using patient-controlled epidural analgesia after oncological surgery. A prospective, randomized single center study

The aim of this study was to compare patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) versus conventional opioid intravenous (IV) infusion after gastrointestinal cancer surgery regarding several post-surgery parameters of recovery. One hundred and one patients were prospectively randomized to receive ei...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Romanian journal of anaesthesia and intensive care 2017-04, Vol.24 (1), p.29-36
Hauptverfasser: Zgâia, Armeana Olimpia, Lisencu, Cosmin Ioan, Rogobete, Alexandru, Vlad, Cătălin, Achimaş-Cadariu, Patriciu, Lazăr, Gabriel, Muntean, Maximilian, Ignat, Florin, Ormindean, Vlad, Irimie, Alexandru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to compare patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) versus conventional opioid intravenous (IV) infusion after gastrointestinal cancer surgery regarding several post-surgery parameters of recovery. One hundred and one patients were prospectively randomized to receive either thoracic/lumbar PCEA (PCEA group) or the standard analgesia technique used in our hospital, conventional IV infusion of morphine (IVMO group) after gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Pain intensity, time of mobilization and bowel function recovery were analyzed post-surgery. We also evaluated postoperative complications and length of Postoperative-Intermediate Intensive Care Unit (PI-ICU) stay and hospital stay. Pain intensity was significantly less in the PCEA group in comparison with the IVMO Group at awakening 2, 8, 24, 30 and 48 hours after surgery (p
ISSN:2392-7518
2502-0307
DOI:10.21454/rjaic.7518.241.zga