Long-term follow-up after near-infrared fluorescence-guided resection of colorectal liver metastases: A retrospective multicenter analysis

Abstract Background Several studies demonstrated that intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) identifies (sub)capsular colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) missed by other techniques. It is unclear if this results in any survival benefit. This study evalu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2017-08, Vol.43 (8), p.1463-1471
Hauptverfasser: Handgraaf, H.J.M, Boogerd, L.S.F, Höppener, D.J, Peloso, A, Sibinga Mulder, B.G, Hoogstins, C.E.S, Hartgrink, H.H, van de Velde, C.J.H, Mieog, J.S.D, Swijnenburg, R.J, Putter, H, Maestri, M, Braat, A.E, Frangioni, J.V, Vahrmeijer, A.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Several studies demonstrated that intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) identifies (sub)capsular colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) missed by other techniques. It is unclear if this results in any survival benefit. This study evaluates long-term follow-up after NIRF-guided resection of CRLM using ICG. Methods First, patients undergoing resection of CRLM with or without NIRF imaging were analyzed retrospectively. Perioperative details, liver-specific recurrence-free interval and overall survival were compared. Second, the prognosis of patients in whom additional metastases were identified solely by NIRF was studied. Results Eighty-six patients underwent resection with NIRF imaging and 87 without. In significantly more patients of the NIRF imaging cohort additional metastases were identified during surgery (25% vs. 13%, p  = 0.04). Tumors identified solely by NIRF imaging were significantly smaller compared to additional metastases identified also by inspection, palpation or intraoperative ultrasound (3.2 ± 1.8 mm vs. 7.4 ± 2.6 mm, p  
ISSN:0748-7983
1532-2157
DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2017.04.016