Quantitative measurement of medial femoral knee cartilage volume – analysis of the OA Biomarkers Consortium FNIH Study cohort

Summary Objective Large studies of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) require well-characterized efficient methods to assess progression. We previously developed the local-area cartilage segmentation (LACS) software method, to measure cartilage volume on MRI scans. The present study further validates this me...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Osteoarthritis and cartilage 2017-07, Vol.25 (7), p.1107-1113
Hauptverfasser: Schaefer, Lena F, Sury, Meera, Yin, Ming, Jamieson, Scott, Donnell, Isaac, Smith, Stacy E, Lynch, John A, Nevitt, Michael C, Duryea, Jeffrey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Objective Large studies of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) require well-characterized efficient methods to assess progression. We previously developed the local-area cartilage segmentation (LACS) software method, to measure cartilage volume on MRI scans. The present study further validates this method in a larger patient cohort and assesses predictive validity in a case-control study. Method The OA Biomarkers Consortium FNIH Project, a case-control study of KOA progression nested within the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), includes 600 subjects in four subgroups based on radiographic and pain progression. Our software tool measured change in medial femoral cartilage volume in a central weight-bearing region. Different sized regions of cartilage were assessed to explore their sensitivity to change. The readings were performed on MRI scans at the baseline and 24-month visits. We used standard response means (SRM) for responsiveness and logistic regression for predictive validity. Results Cartilage volume change was associated strongly with radiographic progression (OR=4.66; 95% CI=2.85-7.62). Odds ratios were significant but of lesser magnitude for the combined radiographic and pain progression outcome (OR=1.70; 95% CI=1.40-2.07). For the full 600 subjects, the SRM was -0.51 for the largest segmented area. Smaller areas of cartilage segmentation were also able to predict the case-control status. The average reader time for the largest area was less than 20 minutes per scan. Smaller areas could be assessed with less reader time. Conclusion We demonstrated that the LACS method is fast, responsive, and associated with radiographic and pain progression, and is appropriate for existing and future large studies of KOA.
ISSN:1063-4584
1522-9653
DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2017.01.010