Focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) by emergency medicine residents in patients with suspected cardiovascular diseases
Introduction Few studies have assessed the value and accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) performed by emergency physicians. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FOCUS performed by emergency medicine residents compared to echocardiography performed by a c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of ultrasound 2017-06, Vol.20 (2), p.133-138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Few studies have assessed the value and accuracy of focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) performed by emergency physicians. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FOCUS performed by emergency medicine residents compared to echocardiography performed by a cardiologist in emergency department (ED) patients suspected of cardiovascular disease.
Methods
The research involved a prospective observational cross-sectional study enrolling patients over 18-years old suspected of having cardiovascular disease who required an echocardiograph. For each patient, a FOCUS test was conducted by a trained emergency medicine resident. The diagnostic accuracy of ED performed FOCUS was compared to echocardiography performed by a cardiologist (gold standard) in the ED. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios were calculated for FOCUS. The agreement of EM residents and cardiologists on each finding was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa coefficient with 95% CI.
Results
Two hundred and five patients, with a mean age of 61.0 ± 17 years (50% male), were included in this study. Agreement between FOCUS performed by an emergency medicine resident and echocardiography performed by a cardiologist in measuring ejection fraction of the left ventricle was 91% (
κ
= 0.85; 95% CI = 0.79–0.91). Reports of the two groups for identifying right ventricular enlargement showed 96% agreement (
κ
= 0.86; 95% CI = 0.82–0.90). The agreements for right ventricular pressure overload, wall motion abnormality and pericardial effusion were 100% (
κ
= 0.83; 95% CI = 0.77–0.89), 92% (
κ
= 0.83; 95% CI = 0.76–0.90), and 96% (
κ
= 0.83; 95% CI = 0.77–0.89), respectively.
Conclusion
FOCUS performed by emergency medicine residents is comparable to echocardiography performed by cardiologists. Therefore, it could be a reliable tool and screening test for initial testing of patients suspected of cardiac abnormalities. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1876-7931 1971-3495 1876-7931 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40477-017-0246-5 |