Impact of biologic therapies on risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with psoriasis: systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

Summary Concerns have been raised regarding an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident or cardiovascular death) in patients treated with anti‐interleukin (IL)‐12/23 agents for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. We aimed to examine the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of dermatology (1951) 2017-04, Vol.176 (4), p.890-901
Hauptverfasser: Rungapiromnan, W., Yiu, Z.Z.N., Warren, R.B., Griffiths, C.E.M., Ashcroft, D.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Concerns have been raised regarding an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident or cardiovascular death) in patients treated with anti‐interleukin (IL)‐12/23 agents for moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis. We aimed to examine the risk of MACEs in adult patients with plaque psoriasis that are exposed to biologic therapies via a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data were obtained from systematic searches in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Embase, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, individual pharmaceutical companies online search platforms and five trials registers (up to 31 March 2016). We selected RCTs reporting adverse events in adults with plaque psoriasis receiving at least one licensed dose of biologic therapy, conventional systematic therapy or placebo. We calculated Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and calculated I2 statistics to assess heterogeneity. Overall, 38 RCTs involving 18 024 patients were included. No MACEs were observed in 29 studies, while nine RCTs reported 10 patients experiencing MACEs. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of MACEs associated with the use of biologic therapies overall (OR 1·45, 95% CI 0·34–6·24); tumour necrosis factor‐α inhibitors (adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab) (OR 0·67, 95% CI 0·10–4·63); anti‐IL‐17A agents (secukinumab and ixekizumab) (OR 1·00, 95% CI 0·09–11·09) or ustekinumab (OR 4·48, 95% CI 0·24–84·77). No heterogeneity was observed in these comparisons. In conclusion, the limited existing evidence suggests that licensed biologic therapies are not associated with MACEs during the short randomized controlled periods in clinical trials. What's already known about this topic? The association between biologic therapies and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among patients with plaque psoriasis is unclear. What does this study add? This is the largest meta‐analysis to examine the risk of MACEs and biologic therapies; it includes 38 randomized controlled trials (18 024 patients with psoriasis) and considers ixekizumab, which has only recently been licensed for use in patients with plaque psoriasis. The results of this systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials show there was no significant difference in risk of MACEs in patients with plaque psoriasis who were exposed to biologic therapies. Linked Co
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/bjd.14964