A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial

Family-centered rounds (FCRs) have become standard of care, despite the limited evaluation of FCRs' benefits or interventions to support high-quality FCR delivery. This work examines the impact of the FCR checklist intervention, a checklist and associated provider training, on performance of FC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2017-05, Vol.139 (5), p.E20161688
Hauptverfasser: Cox, Elizabeth D, Jacobsohn, Gwen C, Rajamanickam, Victoria P, Carayon, Pascale, Kelly, Michelle M, Wetterneck, Tosha B, Rathouz, Paul J, Brown, Roger L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page E20161688
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 139
creator Cox, Elizabeth D
Jacobsohn, Gwen C
Rajamanickam, Victoria P
Carayon, Pascale
Kelly, Michelle M
Wetterneck, Tosha B
Rathouz, Paul J
Brown, Roger L
description Family-centered rounds (FCRs) have become standard of care, despite the limited evaluation of FCRs' benefits or interventions to support high-quality FCR delivery. This work examines the impact of the FCR checklist intervention, a checklist and associated provider training, on performance of FCR elements, family engagement, and patient safety. This cluster randomized trial involved 298 families. Two hospital services were randomized to use the checklist; 2 others delivered usual care. We evaluated the performance of 8 FCR checklist elements and family engagement from 673 pre- and postintervention FCR videos and assessed the safety climate with the Children's Hospital Safety Climate Questionnaire. Random effects regression models were used to assess intervention impact. The intervention significantly increased the number of FCR checklist elements performed (β = 1.2, < .001). Intervention rounds were significantly more likely to include asking the family (odds ratio [OR] = 2.43, < .05) or health care team (OR = 4.28, = .002) for questions and reading back orders (OR = 12.43, < .001). Intervention families' engagement and reports of safety climate were no different from usual care. However, performance of specific checklist elements was associated with changes in these outcomes. For example, order read-back was associated with significantly more family engagement. Asking families for questions was associated with significantly better ratings of staff's communication openness and safety of handoffs and transitions. The performance of FCR checklist elements was enhanced by checklist implementation and associated with changes in family engagement and more positive perceptions of safety climate. Implementing the checklist improves delivery of FCRs, impacting quality and safety of care.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.2016-1688
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5404725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A498927642</galeid><sourcerecordid>A498927642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-902278da2cf15a9dd246e9dc7962a42da87e68fad75b721041e2e825dc0566393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFrFDEYhoModlu9epQBLx46a_JNMsl4EJahVaFQqfUoIU2-2aZmJtvJjLj99WbZtainkOTJy_fmIeQVo0smOLzboEtLoKwuWa3UE7JgtFElBymekgWlFSs5peKIHKd0RynlQsJzcgRKCCmBLsj3VXFueh-2ZYvDhCO64irOg0tFe4v2R_BpOj0QxdmwNmvsM3damMEVX8zk86b4ajqctu-LVXGVj2PvH3LK9ehNeEGedSYkfHlYT8i387Pr9lN5cfnxc7u6KC0X9VQ2FEAqZ8B2TJjGOeA1Ns7KpgbDwRklsVadcVLcSGCUMwRUIJyloq6rpjohH_a5m_mmR2fzVKMJejP63oxbHY3X_94M_lav408tOOUSRA54ewgY4_2MadK9TxZDMAPGOWnWUA4ZraqMvvkPvYvzOOR6mqlGNaISgmeq3FNrE1D7wcb8u78mG0PANercvr3UK555kDWHzC_3vB1jSiN2j8Mzqnem9c603pnWO9P5weu_Kz_if9RWvwGAlKLy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1898953554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cox, Elizabeth D ; Jacobsohn, Gwen C ; Rajamanickam, Victoria P ; Carayon, Pascale ; Kelly, Michelle M ; Wetterneck, Tosha B ; Rathouz, Paul J ; Brown, Roger L</creator><creatorcontrib>Cox, Elizabeth D ; Jacobsohn, Gwen C ; Rajamanickam, Victoria P ; Carayon, Pascale ; Kelly, Michelle M ; Wetterneck, Tosha B ; Rathouz, Paul J ; Brown, Roger L</creatorcontrib><description>Family-centered rounds (FCRs) have become standard of care, despite the limited evaluation of FCRs' benefits or interventions to support high-quality FCR delivery. This work examines the impact of the FCR checklist intervention, a checklist and associated provider training, on performance of FCR elements, family engagement, and patient safety. This cluster randomized trial involved 298 families. Two hospital services were randomized to use the checklist; 2 others delivered usual care. We evaluated the performance of 8 FCR checklist elements and family engagement from 673 pre- and postintervention FCR videos and assessed the safety climate with the Children's Hospital Safety Climate Questionnaire. Random effects regression models were used to assess intervention impact. The intervention significantly increased the number of FCR checklist elements performed (β = 1.2, &lt; .001). Intervention rounds were significantly more likely to include asking the family (odds ratio [OR] = 2.43, &lt; .05) or health care team (OR = 4.28, = .002) for questions and reading back orders (OR = 12.43, &lt; .001). Intervention families' engagement and reports of safety climate were no different from usual care. However, performance of specific checklist elements was associated with changes in these outcomes. For example, order read-back was associated with significantly more family engagement. Asking families for questions was associated with significantly better ratings of staff's communication openness and safety of handoffs and transitions. The performance of FCR checklist elements was enhanced by checklist implementation and associated with changes in family engagement and more positive perceptions of safety climate. Implementing the checklist improves delivery of FCRs, impacting quality and safety of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1688</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28557720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Checklist - methods ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Climate effects ; Clinical trials ; Families &amp; family life ; Family ; Family counseling ; Family psychotherapy ; Female ; Hospital patients ; Hospitals, Pediatric ; Humans ; Intervention ; Male ; Patient Care Team ; Patient Safety ; Pediatrics ; Professional-Family Relations ; Regression analysis ; Safety ; Safety and security measures ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching Rounds - methods</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2017-05, Vol.139 (5), p.E20161688</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics May 2017</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 by the American Academy of Pediatrics 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-902278da2cf15a9dd246e9dc7962a42da87e68fad75b721041e2e825dc0566393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-902278da2cf15a9dd246e9dc7962a42da87e68fad75b721041e2e825dc0566393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28557720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cox, Elizabeth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsohn, Gwen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajamanickam, Victoria P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carayon, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michelle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetterneck, Tosha B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathouz, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Roger L</creatorcontrib><title>A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>Family-centered rounds (FCRs) have become standard of care, despite the limited evaluation of FCRs' benefits or interventions to support high-quality FCR delivery. This work examines the impact of the FCR checklist intervention, a checklist and associated provider training, on performance of FCR elements, family engagement, and patient safety. This cluster randomized trial involved 298 families. Two hospital services were randomized to use the checklist; 2 others delivered usual care. We evaluated the performance of 8 FCR checklist elements and family engagement from 673 pre- and postintervention FCR videos and assessed the safety climate with the Children's Hospital Safety Climate Questionnaire. Random effects regression models were used to assess intervention impact. The intervention significantly increased the number of FCR checklist elements performed (β = 1.2, &lt; .001). Intervention rounds were significantly more likely to include asking the family (odds ratio [OR] = 2.43, &lt; .05) or health care team (OR = 4.28, = .002) for questions and reading back orders (OR = 12.43, &lt; .001). Intervention families' engagement and reports of safety climate were no different from usual care. However, performance of specific checklist elements was associated with changes in these outcomes. For example, order read-back was associated with significantly more family engagement. Asking families for questions was associated with significantly better ratings of staff's communication openness and safety of handoffs and transitions. The performance of FCR checklist elements was enhanced by checklist implementation and associated with changes in family engagement and more positive perceptions of safety climate. Implementing the checklist improves delivery of FCRs, impacting quality and safety of care.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Checklist - methods</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Family counseling</subject><subject>Family psychotherapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Hospitals, Pediatric</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Professional-Family Relations</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching Rounds - methods</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFrFDEYhoModlu9epQBLx46a_JNMsl4EJahVaFQqfUoIU2-2aZmJtvJjLj99WbZtainkOTJy_fmIeQVo0smOLzboEtLoKwuWa3UE7JgtFElBymekgWlFSs5peKIHKd0RynlQsJzcgRKCCmBLsj3VXFueh-2ZYvDhCO64irOg0tFe4v2R_BpOj0QxdmwNmvsM3damMEVX8zk86b4ajqctu-LVXGVj2PvH3LK9ehNeEGedSYkfHlYT8i387Pr9lN5cfnxc7u6KC0X9VQ2FEAqZ8B2TJjGOeA1Ns7KpgbDwRklsVadcVLcSGCUMwRUIJyloq6rpjohH_a5m_mmR2fzVKMJejP63oxbHY3X_94M_lav408tOOUSRA54ewgY4_2MadK9TxZDMAPGOWnWUA4ZraqMvvkPvYvzOOR6mqlGNaISgmeq3FNrE1D7wcb8u78mG0PANercvr3UK555kDWHzC_3vB1jSiN2j8Mzqnem9c603pnWO9P5weu_Kz_if9RWvwGAlKLy</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Cox, Elizabeth D</creator><creator>Jacobsohn, Gwen C</creator><creator>Rajamanickam, Victoria P</creator><creator>Carayon, Pascale</creator><creator>Kelly, Michelle M</creator><creator>Wetterneck, Tosha B</creator><creator>Rathouz, Paul J</creator><creator>Brown, Roger L</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial</title><author>Cox, Elizabeth D ; Jacobsohn, Gwen C ; Rajamanickam, Victoria P ; Carayon, Pascale ; Kelly, Michelle M ; Wetterneck, Tosha B ; Rathouz, Paul J ; Brown, Roger L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-902278da2cf15a9dd246e9dc7962a42da87e68fad75b721041e2e825dc0566393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Checklist - methods</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Family counseling</topic><topic>Family psychotherapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Hospitals, Pediatric</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Professional-Family Relations</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching Rounds - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cox, Elizabeth D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobsohn, Gwen C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajamanickam, Victoria P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carayon, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michelle M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wetterneck, Tosha B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathouz, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Roger L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cox, Elizabeth D</au><au>Jacobsohn, Gwen C</au><au>Rajamanickam, Victoria P</au><au>Carayon, Pascale</au><au>Kelly, Michelle M</au><au>Wetterneck, Tosha B</au><au>Rathouz, Paul J</au><au>Brown, Roger L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>139</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>E20161688</spage><pages>E20161688-</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><abstract>Family-centered rounds (FCRs) have become standard of care, despite the limited evaluation of FCRs' benefits or interventions to support high-quality FCR delivery. This work examines the impact of the FCR checklist intervention, a checklist and associated provider training, on performance of FCR elements, family engagement, and patient safety. This cluster randomized trial involved 298 families. Two hospital services were randomized to use the checklist; 2 others delivered usual care. We evaluated the performance of 8 FCR checklist elements and family engagement from 673 pre- and postintervention FCR videos and assessed the safety climate with the Children's Hospital Safety Climate Questionnaire. Random effects regression models were used to assess intervention impact. The intervention significantly increased the number of FCR checklist elements performed (β = 1.2, &lt; .001). Intervention rounds were significantly more likely to include asking the family (odds ratio [OR] = 2.43, &lt; .05) or health care team (OR = 4.28, = .002) for questions and reading back orders (OR = 12.43, &lt; .001). Intervention families' engagement and reports of safety climate were no different from usual care. However, performance of specific checklist elements was associated with changes in these outcomes. For example, order read-back was associated with significantly more family engagement. Asking families for questions was associated with significantly better ratings of staff's communication openness and safety of handoffs and transitions. The performance of FCR checklist elements was enhanced by checklist implementation and associated with changes in family engagement and more positive perceptions of safety climate. Implementing the checklist improves delivery of FCRs, impacting quality and safety of care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>28557720</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.2016-1688</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2017-05, Vol.139 (5), p.E20161688
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5404725
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Care and treatment
Checklist - methods
Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Climate effects
Clinical trials
Families & family life
Family
Family counseling
Family psychotherapy
Female
Hospital patients
Hospitals, Pediatric
Humans
Intervention
Male
Patient Care Team
Patient Safety
Pediatrics
Professional-Family Relations
Regression analysis
Safety
Safety and security measures
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching Rounds - methods
title A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A42%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Family-Centered%20Rounds%20Checklist,%20Family%20Engagement,%20and%20Patient%20Safety:%20A%20Randomized%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Cox,%20Elizabeth%20D&rft.date=2017-05&rft.volume=139&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=E20161688&rft.pages=E20161688-&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.2016-1688&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA498927642%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1898953554&rft_id=info:pmid/28557720&rft_galeid=A498927642&rfr_iscdi=true