A Family-Centered Rounds Checklist, Family Engagement, and Patient Safety: A Randomized Trial

Family-centered rounds (FCRs) have become standard of care, despite the limited evaluation of FCRs' benefits or interventions to support high-quality FCR delivery. This work examines the impact of the FCR checklist intervention, a checklist and associated provider training, on performance of FC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2017-05, Vol.139 (5), p.E20161688
Hauptverfasser: Cox, Elizabeth D, Jacobsohn, Gwen C, Rajamanickam, Victoria P, Carayon, Pascale, Kelly, Michelle M, Wetterneck, Tosha B, Rathouz, Paul J, Brown, Roger L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Family-centered rounds (FCRs) have become standard of care, despite the limited evaluation of FCRs' benefits or interventions to support high-quality FCR delivery. This work examines the impact of the FCR checklist intervention, a checklist and associated provider training, on performance of FCR elements, family engagement, and patient safety. This cluster randomized trial involved 298 families. Two hospital services were randomized to use the checklist; 2 others delivered usual care. We evaluated the performance of 8 FCR checklist elements and family engagement from 673 pre- and postintervention FCR videos and assessed the safety climate with the Children's Hospital Safety Climate Questionnaire. Random effects regression models were used to assess intervention impact. The intervention significantly increased the number of FCR checklist elements performed (β = 1.2, < .001). Intervention rounds were significantly more likely to include asking the family (odds ratio [OR] = 2.43, < .05) or health care team (OR = 4.28, = .002) for questions and reading back orders (OR = 12.43, < .001). Intervention families' engagement and reports of safety climate were no different from usual care. However, performance of specific checklist elements was associated with changes in these outcomes. For example, order read-back was associated with significantly more family engagement. Asking families for questions was associated with significantly better ratings of staff's communication openness and safety of handoffs and transitions. The performance of FCR checklist elements was enhanced by checklist implementation and associated with changes in family engagement and more positive perceptions of safety climate. Implementing the checklist improves delivery of FCRs, impacting quality and safety of care.
ISSN:0031-4005
1098-4275
DOI:10.1542/peds.2016-1688