Sympathetic modulation of electrical activation in normal and infarcted myocardium: implications for arrhythmogenesis

The influence of cardiac sympathetic innervation on electrical activation in normal and chronically infarcted ventricular myocardium is not understood. Yorkshire pigs with normal hearts (NL, = 12) or anterior myocardial infarction (MI, = 9) underwent high-resolution mapping of the anteroapical left...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology 2017-03, Vol.312 (3), p.H608-H621
Hauptverfasser: Ajijola, Olujimi A, Lux, Robert L, Khahera, Anadjeet, Kwon, OhJin, Aliotta, Eric, Ennis, Daniel B, Fishbein, Michael C, Ardell, Jeffrey L, Shivkumar, Kalyanam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The influence of cardiac sympathetic innervation on electrical activation in normal and chronically infarcted ventricular myocardium is not understood. Yorkshire pigs with normal hearts (NL, = 12) or anterior myocardial infarction (MI, = 9) underwent high-resolution mapping of the anteroapical left ventricle at baseline and during left and right stellate ganglion stimulation (LSGS and RSGS, respectively). Conduction velocity (CV), activation times (ATs), and directionality of propagation were measured. Myocardial fiber orientation was determined using diffusion tensor imaging and histology. Longitudinal CV (CV ) was increased by RSGS (0.98 ± 0.11 vs. 1.2 ± 0.14m/s, < 0.001) but not transverse CV (CV ). This increase was abrogated by β-adrenergic receptor and gap junction (GJ) blockade. Neither CV nor CV was increased by LSGS. In the peri-infarct region, both RSGS and LSGS shortened ARIs in sinus rhythm (423 ± 37 vs. 322 ± 30 ms, < 0.001, and 423 ± 36 vs. 398 ± 36 ms, = 0.035, respectively) and altered activation patterns in all animals. CV, as estimated by mean ATs, increased in a directionally dependent manner by RSGS (14.6 ± 1.2 vs. 17.3 ± 1.6 ms, = 0.015), associated with GJ lateralization. RSGS and LSGS inhomogeneously modulated AT and induced relative or absolute functional activation delay in parts of the mapped regions in 75 and 67%, respectively, in MI animals, and in 0 and 15%, respectively, in control animals ( < 0.001 for both). In conclusion, sympathoexcitation increases CV in normal myocardium and modulates activation propagation in peri-infarcted ventricular myocardium. These data demonstrate functional control of arrhythmogenic peri-infarct substrates by sympathetic nerves and in part explain the temporal nature of arrhythmogenesis. This study demonstrates regional control of conduction velocity in normal hearts by sympathetic nerves. In infarcted hearts, however, not only is modulation of propagation heterogeneous, some regions showed paradoxical conduction slowing. Sympathoexcitation altered propagation in all infarcted hearts studied, and we describe the temporal arrhythmogenic potential of these findings.Listen to this article's corresponding podcast at http://ajpheart.podbean.com/e/sympathetic-nerves-and-cardiac-propagation/.
ISSN:0363-6135
1522-1539
DOI:10.1152/ajpheart.00575.2016