Delayed match-to-sample in working memory: A BrainMap meta-analysis

•Meta-analysis of standard task showing common underlying networks of working memory.•Working memory recruits activity in the DLPFC, PPC, fusiform gyrus.•DMTS shows some neural divergence when compared to similar WM tasks.•Comparison of verbal and non-verbal stimuli shows differences in WM networks....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological psychology 2016-10, Vol.120, p.10-20
Hauptverfasser: Daniel, Thomas A., Katz, Jeffrey S., Robinson, Jennifer L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Meta-analysis of standard task showing common underlying networks of working memory.•Working memory recruits activity in the DLPFC, PPC, fusiform gyrus.•DMTS shows some neural divergence when compared to similar WM tasks.•Comparison of verbal and non-verbal stimuli shows differences in WM networks. Working memory (WM), or the ability to temporarily store and manipulate information, is one of the most widely studied constructs in cognitive psychology. Since its inception, it has become one of the leading explanations for how humans are able to operate on a cognitive level. The current study probed the neural networks underlying one of the most commonly used tasks, delayed match-to-sample (DMTS), to study WM. An activation likelihood estimation (ALE) analysis of 42 functional neuroimaging studies (626 participants) was conducted to demonstrate neural network engagement during DMTS. Results demonstrated strong convergence in brain regions commonly associated with the working memory construct (i.e., dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, fusiform gyrus, and posterior parietal cortex). However, neural activation in two regions frequently attributed to WM were absent from this meta-analysis: the anterior cingulate and the rostral prefrontal cortex, suggesting that these regions may be more sensitive to task or stimuli characteristics. In a post-hoc analysis, we deconstructed the DMTS meta-analysis to examine nonverbal versus verbal stimuli, and found notable neurofunctional differences such that DMTS using nonverbal stimuli consistently engaged the right middle frontal gyrus (BA 6/46) and precuneus (BA 7) more so than verbal stimuli based DMTS. These results provide a foundation for future models of functional connectivity that may elucidate subtle differences in working memory attributable to pathological processes.
ISSN:0301-0511
1873-6246
DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.015