Conformational diversity and enantioconvergence in potato epoxide hydrolase 1† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Further details on calibration of our simulations, QM data and RMSD plots from the MD simulations, further experimental data, and all EVB parameters used to model styrene oxide hydrolysis in this study. See DOI: 10.1039/c6ob00060f Click here for additional data file

Computational studies highlight the importance of conformational diversity in the enantioconvergent hydrolysis of styrene oxide by potato epoxide hydrolase 1. Potato epoxide hydrolase 1 (StEH1) is a biocatalytically important enzyme that exhibits rich enantio- and regioselectivity in the hydrolysis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Organic & biomolecular chemistry 2016-03, Vol.14 (24), p.5639-5651
Hauptverfasser: Bauer, P., Carlsson, Å. Janfalk, Amrein, B. A., Dobritzsch, D., Widersten, M., Kamerlin, S. C. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Computational studies highlight the importance of conformational diversity in the enantioconvergent hydrolysis of styrene oxide by potato epoxide hydrolase 1. Potato epoxide hydrolase 1 (StEH1) is a biocatalytically important enzyme that exhibits rich enantio- and regioselectivity in the hydrolysis of chiral epoxide substrates. In particular, StEH1 has been demonstrated to enantioconvergently hydrolyze racemic mixes of styrene oxide (SO) to yield ( R )-1-phenylethanediol. This work combines computational, crystallographic and biochemical analyses to understand both the origins of the enantioconvergent behavior of the wild-type enzyme, as well as shifts in activities and substrate binding preferences in an engineered StEH1 variant, R-C1B1, which contains four active site substitutions (W106L, L109Y, V141K and I155V). Our calculations are able to reproduce both the enantio- and regioselectivities of StEH1, and demonstrate a clear link between different substrate binding modes and the corresponding selectivity, with the preferred binding modes being shifted between the wild-type enzyme and the R-C1B1 variant. Additionally, we demonstrate that the observed changes in selectivity and the corresponding enantioconvergent behavior are due to a combination of steric and electrostatic effects that modulate both the accessibility of the different carbon atoms to the nucleophilic side chain of D105, as well as the interactions between the substrate and protein amino acid side chains and active site water molecules. Being able to computationally predict such subtle effects for different substrate enantiomers, as well as to understand their origin and how they are affected by mutations, is an important advance towards the computational design of improved biocatalysts for enantioselective synthesis.
ISSN:1477-0520
1477-0539
DOI:10.1039/c6ob00060f