Diabetes prevalence is associated with different community factors in the diabetes belt versus the rest of the United States

Objective To investigate differences in community characteristics associated with diabetes prevalence between the Diabetes Belt and the rest of the contiguous United States (U.S.) Methods County‐level adult diabetes prevalence estimates (i.e., percent of people [≥20 years] with diagnosed diabetes 20...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Md.), 2017-02, Vol.25 (2), p.452-459
Hauptverfasser: Myers, Candice A., Slack, Tim, Broyles, Stephanie T., Heymsfield, Steven B., Church, Timothy S., Martin, Corby K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To investigate differences in community characteristics associated with diabetes prevalence between the Diabetes Belt and the rest of the contiguous United States (U.S.) Methods County‐level adult diabetes prevalence estimates (i.e., percent of people [≥20 years] with diagnosed diabetes 2009) were used from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in addition to data from the U.S. Census Bureau, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, to carry out a spatial regime analysis to identify county‐level factors correlated with diabetes prevalence in the Diabetes Belt versus the remainder of the U.S. Results Counties outside of the Diabetes Belt demonstrated stronger positive associations between diabetes prevalence and persistent poverty and greater percentages of unemployed labor forces. For counties in the Diabetes Belt, diabetes prevalence showed a stronger positive association with natural amenities (e.g., temperate climate and topographic features) and a stronger negative association with fitness/recreation facility density. Conclusions Community‐level correlates of diabetes prevalence differed between the Diabetes Belt and elsewhere in the U.S. Economic hardship was shown to be more relevant outside the Diabetes Belt, while recreational context effects were more pronounced among counties within the region. Prevention and treatment targets are geographically unique, and public health efforts should acknowledge these differences in crafting policy.
ISSN:1930-7381
1930-739X
DOI:10.1002/oby.21725