Comparison of methods for circulating cell-free DNA isolation using blood from cancer patients: impact on biomarker testing

The implementation of liquid biopsy for biomarker testing and response to treatment monitoring in cancer patients would presumable increase laboratory throughput, requiring the development of automated methods for circulating free DNA (cfDNA) isolation. The present study compares the MagNA Pure Comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Translational lung cancer research 2016-12, Vol.5 (6), p.665-672
Hauptverfasser: Pérez-Barrios, Clara, Nieto-Alcolado, Irene, Torrente, María, Jiménez-Sánchez, Carolina, Calvo, Virginia, Gutierrez-Sanz, Lourdes, Palka, Magda, Donoso-Navarro, Encarnación, Provencio, Mariano, Romero, Atocha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The implementation of liquid biopsy for biomarker testing and response to treatment monitoring in cancer patients would presumable increase laboratory throughput, requiring the development of automated methods for circulating free DNA (cfDNA) isolation. The present study compares the MagNA Pure Compact (MPC) Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit I and Maxwell RSC (MR) ccfDNA Plasma Kit and the later with QIAamp Circulating Nucleid Acid (QCNA) Kit using 57 plasma samples from cancer patients. cfDNA concentration was measured using the Qubit fluorometer. DNA fragments lengt were assessed using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was quantified by digital PCR (dPCR). Firstly, we observed that MPC method significantly extracted less cfDNA than MR (P
ISSN:2218-6751
2226-4477
DOI:10.21037/tlcr.2016.12.03