Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey

BACKGROUND:Eliciting the priorities of cancer survivors is essential to address the specific needs of cancer survivor subgroups. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to describe the greatest challenges related to treatment for long-term rectal cancer survivors. DESIGN:This was an observational st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the colon & rectum 2016-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1019-1027
Hauptverfasser: McMullen, Carmit K, Bulkley, Joanna E, Altschuler, Andrea, Wendel, Christopher S, Grant, Marcia, Hornbrook, Mark C, Sun, Virginia, Krouse, Robert S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND:Eliciting the priorities of cancer survivors is essential to address the specific needs of cancer survivor subgroups. OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to describe the greatest challenges related to treatment for long-term rectal cancer survivors. DESIGN:This was an observational study with a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS:The study included members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Northwest health plans. PATIENTS:A survey was mailed to long-term (≥5 years postdiagnosis) survivors of rectal cancer who had an anastomosis, temporary ostomy, or permanent ostomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:The main outcome was measured with an open-ended question about the greatest challenge related to cancer surgery. We categorized responses using a grounded theory approach with double coding for reliability. Bonferroni-adjusted χ values were used to assess differences in the proportions of subgroups who mentioned challenges within each response category. RESULTS:The survey completion rate was 61% (577/953); 76% (440/577) of participants responded to the greatest challenge question. The greatest challenges for respondents were bowel/ostomy management (reported by 44%), negative psychosocial effects (37%), late effects of treatment (21%), comorbidities and aging (13%), postoperative recovery (5%), and negative healthcare experiences (5%). Survivors with temporary ostomy or anastomosis were more likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report late effects (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.01). Survivors with anastomosis were less likely than survivors with permanent ostomy to report negative psychosocial impacts (p = 0.0001). LIMITATIONS:Generalizability is restricted by the lack of ethnically and racially diverse, uninsured (non-Medicare–eligible population), and non-English–speaking participants. Because the survey was cross-sectional and included respondents at different times since diagnosis, we could not adequately address changes in the greatest challenges over time. CONCLUSIONS:Our results reveal the need for bowel/ostomy management, psychosocial services, and surveillance for late effects in survivorship and supportive care services for all survivors of rectal cancer, regardless of ostomy status. The perspective of long-term survivors with anastomosis reveals challenges that may not be anticipated during decision making for treatment (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A254).
ISSN:0012-3706
1530-0358
DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000695