Is There a Dose-Response Relationship for Heart Disease With Low-Dose Radiation Therapy?

Purpose To quantify cardiac radiation therapy (RT) exposure using sensitive measures of cardiac dysfunction; and to correlate dysfunction with heart doses, in the setting of adjuvant RT for left-sided breast cancer. Methods and Materials On a randomized trial, 32 women with node-positive left-sided...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2013-03, Vol.85 (4), p.959-964
Hauptverfasser: Chung, Eugene, MD, PhD, JD, Corbett, James R., MD, Moran, Jean M., PhD, Griffith, Kent A., MS, Marsh, Robin B., CMD, Feng, Mary, MD, Jagsi, Reshma, MD, DPhil, Kessler, Marc L., PhD, Ficaro, Edward C., PhD, Pierce, Lori J., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To quantify cardiac radiation therapy (RT) exposure using sensitive measures of cardiac dysfunction; and to correlate dysfunction with heart doses, in the setting of adjuvant RT for left-sided breast cancer. Methods and Materials On a randomized trial, 32 women with node-positive left-sided breast cancer underwent pre-RT stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) myocardial perfusion scans. Patients received RT to the breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes to doses of 50 to 52.2 Gy. Repeat SPECT-CT scans were performed 1 year after RT. Perfusion defects (PD), summed stress defects scores (SSS), and ejection fractions (EF) were evaluated. Doses to the heart and coronary arteries were quantified. Results The mean difference in pre- and post-RT PD was −0.38% ± 3.20% ( P =.68), with no clinically significant defects. To assess for subclinical effects, PD were also examined using a 1.5-SD below the normal mean threshold, with a mean difference of 2.53% ± 12.57% ( P =.38). The mean differences in SSS and EF before and after RT were 0.78% ± 2.50% ( P =.08) and 1.75% ± 7.29% ( P =.39), respectively. The average heart Dmean and D95 were 2.82 Gy (range, 1.11-6.06 Gy) and 0.90 Gy (range, 0.13-2.17 Gy), respectively. The average Dmean and D95 to the left anterior descending artery were 7.22 Gy (range, 2.58-18.05 Gy) and 3.22 Gy (range, 1.23-6.86 Gy), respectively. No correlations were found between cardiac doses and changes in PD, SSS, and EF. Conclusions Using sensitive measures of cardiac function, no clinically significant defects were found after RT, with the average heart Dmean
ISSN:0360-3016
1879-355X
DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.002