Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the detection of prostate cancer: meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for the detection of prostate cancer in comparison with standard evaluation with T2-weighted imaging. A PubMed electronic database search for the terms "dynamic contrast-enhanced,&quo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of roentgenology (1976) 2015-04, Vol.204 (4), p.W439-W448
Hauptverfasser: Tan, Cher Heng, Hobbs, Brian Paul, Wei, Wei, Kundra, Vikas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for the detection of prostate cancer in comparison with standard evaluation with T2-weighted imaging. A PubMed electronic database search for the terms "dynamic contrast-enhanced," "prostate," and "MRI" was completed for articles up to September 17, 2013. All included studies had histopathologic correlation. Two by two contingency data were constructed for each study. A binormal bayesian ROC model was used to estimate and compare sensitivity, specificity, and AUC among eligible modalities. Both DCE-MRI (0.82-0.86) and diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) (0.84-0.88) yielded significantly better AUC than T2-weighted imaging (0.68-0.77). Moreover, partial AUC for the combination of DCE-MRI, DWI, and T2-weighted imaging was improved significantly (0.111; 0.103-0.119) when compared with DCE-MRI alone (0.079; 0.072-0.085) and T2-weighted imaging alone (0.079; 0.074-0.084) but not DWI alone (0.099; 0.091-0.108). Sensitivity and specificity were similar among the four modalities. DCE-MRI improves AUC of tumor detection overall compared with T2-weighted imaging alone. Methods for DCE-MRI analysis require standardization, but visual analysis performs similar to semiquantitative methods. A two-parameter approach using DCE-MRI and T2-weighted imaging or DWI and T2-weighted imaging may be sufficient, and the latter may be more favorable for most routine prostate cancer imaging.
ISSN:0361-803X
1546-3141
DOI:10.2214/ajr.14.13373