Choice of hospital: Which type of quality matters?

•Patients choose hospitals that improve their self-reported health.•Quality, as measured by readmission and mortality rates, is less important.•Healthier patients are more willing or able to travel for higher quality.•Quality competition in the English NHS is possible.•Potential for competition decl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of health economics 2016-12, Vol.50, p.230-246
Hauptverfasser: Gutacker, Nils, Siciliani, Luigi, Moscelli, Giuseppe, Gravelle, Hugh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Patients choose hospitals that improve their self-reported health.•Quality, as measured by readmission and mortality rates, is less important.•Healthier patients are more willing or able to travel for higher quality.•Quality competition in the English NHS is possible.•Potential for competition declines rapidly with distance between hospitals. The implications of hospital quality competition depend on what type of quality affects choice of hospital. Previous studies of quality and choice of hospitals have used crude measures of quality such as mortality and readmission rates rather than measures of the health gain from specific treatments. We estimate multinomial logit models of hospital choice by patients undergoing hip replacement surgery in the English NHS to test whether hospital demand responds to quality as measured by detailed patient reports of health before and after hip replacement. We find that a one standard deviation increase in average health gain increases demand by up to 10%. The more traditional measures of hospital quality are less important in determining hospital choice.
ISSN:0167-6296
1879-1646
DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.08.001