Chemical shift MR imaging in the lumbar vertebra: the effect of field strength, scanner vendors and flip angles in repeatability of signal intensity index measurement
To evaluate the reproducibility of signal intensity index (SII) measurements with MRI systems from different vendors and with different field strengths, and to test the effectiveness of flip angle. Thirty-two healthy volunteers (mean age 35.3 ± 9.3 years) were enrolled in this ethics committee-appro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC medical imaging 2016-11, Vol.16 (1), p.64-64, Article 64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To evaluate the reproducibility of signal intensity index (SII) measurements with MRI systems from different vendors and with different field strengths, and to test the effectiveness of flip angle.
Thirty-two healthy volunteers (mean age 35.3 ± 9.3 years) were enrolled in this ethics committee-approved study. Chemical shift MR imaging was performed on 1.5- and 3.0-T MR systems from three vendors. Two independent observers measured SII values in five lumbar segments. Inter- and intraobserver agreement was assessed using the interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Differences of mean SII values between different field strengths and MR vendors as well as flip angles were compared by using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Differences of mean SII values between different flip angles were also compared by using paired-sample t test.
Inter- and intra-observer correlation coefficients showed good agreement (all ICC > 0.75) when measuring SII values at different MR systems (ICCs ranging from 0.896 to 0.983) and flip angles (ICCs ranging from 0.824 to 0.983). There were no significant differences in mean SII values measured by different MR vendors with different field strengths (all p > 0.05 ranging from 0.337 to 0.824). The differences in the mean SII between the four different flip angles were statistically significant (all p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1471-2342 1471-2342 |
DOI: | 10.1186/s12880-016-0167-3 |